NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

24-Pet-B3 Petroleum Geology · December 2015

Question 9 of 22

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

National Exams, December 2015 — 98-Pet-B3, Oil and Gas Evaluation and Economics (3 hours, closed book, approved non-programmable calculator only). The exam's own cover page is titled "Oil and Gas Evaluation and Economics" and every question is property valuation / reserves & production economics / DCF-NPV screening content — no geology anywhere.

Reference texts: Thompson & Wright, Oil Property Evaluation; Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook (COGEH), Vol. 1 (Society of Petroleum Evaluation Engineers, Calgary Chapter); National Instrument 51-101, Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities (Canadian Securities Administrators); SPE/WPC/AAPG/SPEE Petroleum Resources Management System (PRMS); Ahmed, Reservoir Engineering Handbook.

The exam's own instructions ask for only 7 of the 10 short-answer questions and note the Cash-Flow/Future-Value tables are graded by column; for "choose N of M" exams, every item below is answered in full as a study resource. Questions 1–10 correspond to the exam's printed Short-Answer items 1–10; Questions 11–20 correspond to the printed Multiple-Choice items 1–10; Question 21 is the Future Value table; Question 22 is the Cash Flow table.

Question 9

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Tornado diagram. A tornado diagram is a horizontal bar chart used to rank input variables (oil price, reserves, CAPEX, OPEX, royalty rate, etc.) by how much each one, varied independently over its own realistic low–high range while every other variable is held at its base case, swings the output economic metric (typically NPV). Bars are sorted longest-to-shortest from top to bottom, which gives the chart its funnel/tornado silhouette, and immediately shows which one or two variables actually matter to the decision — the variables with the shortest bars can usually be fixed at their base-case value without materially changing the conclusion.

Tornado Diagram - NPV sensitivity (base case = center line) Oil price Reserves (EUR) CAPEX OPEX Royalty rate low input -> NPV high input -> NPV
Fig. Q9-1 — tornado diagram: each bar shows the swing in NPV from that variable's low (red) to high (green) case, sorted by swing size.

Spider diagram. A spider diagram is a line chart with the % change in an input variable on the x-axis (centred on the base case at 0%) and the resulting % (or absolute) change in the output metric on the y-axis, with one line drawn per variable, all radiating from the same base-case point. The slope (steepness) of each line shows how sensitive the output is to that variable — a steep line means a small change in that input moves the outcome a lot, while a shallow line means the outcome is relatively insensitive to it — and a non-linear (curved) line flags a variable whose effect on NPV is itself non-linear (e.g., a hurdle-rate or price-floor threshold effect).

Spider Diagram - % change in variable vs. % change in NPV +20% input -20% input +NPV -NPV Oil price CAPEX Reserves base case
Fig. Q9-2 — spider diagram: % change in each input (x-axis) vs. resulting % change in NPV (y-axis), one line per variable.

Both tools are used at the project-screening stage to focus further data-gathering and risking effort on the few variables that actually drive the economic outcome, rather than spreading effort evenly across every input.