Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
98-Phys-A5 — Semiconductor Devices & Circuits — National Exams, May 2017
3 hours duration. Closed book exam (useful constants, equations and device models are annexed to the exam paper). Any FIVE (5) of the SEVEN (7) questions constitute a complete exam paper; all seven are answered here as a complete study resource.
Reference texts: A. S. Sedra & K. C. Smith, Microelectronic Circuits, 8th ed. (semiconductor/diode physics Ch. 3–4, op-amp and active-filter circuits Ch. 2 & 12, MOSFET small-signal amplifiers Ch. 7, data converters Ch. 17, precision rectifiers Ch. 4); M. M. Mano & M. D. Ciletti, Digital Design, 6th ed. (CMOS logic-family gates Ch. 10); C. Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics, 8th ed. (semiconductor carrier transport and statistics Ch. 8).
Given. A two-stage active HPF (Figure P3): Stage 1 is a unity-gain Sallen-Key high-pass built from two equal $R$, two equal $C$ and an op-amp wired as a follower; Stage 2 is a non-inverting amplifier with gain-setting resistors $R$ (to ground) and $9R$ (feedback). Natural frequency $\omega_o=1/RC$.
Find. (a) two advantages of active filtering; (b) $R_{in}$, $R_{out}$ (ideal op-amps); (c) derive $F(s)$; (d) $|F(j\omega)|$ in dB and $\angle F(j\omega)$ at $\omega=0.5\omega_o$.
[Figure not reproduced: Figure P3 (exam figure). See the official exam paper or the cited reference text.]
Figure P3 (exam figure) — Stage 1: unity-gain Sallen-Key high-pass ($V_1\to C\to V_x\to C\to$ op-amp $+$ input; $R$ from the $+$ input to ground; $R$ from $V_x$ back to the output $V_2$). Stage 2: non-inverting amplifier, gain $1+9R/R=10$.
Approach. (a) general active-filter advantages. (b) apply the ideal-op-amp idealizations directly. (c) write nodal (KCL) equations for Stage 1 in the Laplace domain to get $H_1(s)=V_2/V_1$, multiply by Stage 2's non-inverting gain $H_2=V_3/V_2$. (d) substitute $s=j(0.5\omega_o)$ into the derived $F(s)$ and evaluate magnitude/phase as a complex number.
Part (a) — advantages of active filters. (i) They can provide gain (and even a steep, sharp roll-off) using only R, C and op-amps — no inductors are needed, which are bulky, lossy and hard to fabricate in IC form at audio/instrumentation frequencies. (ii) The op-amp's low output impedance buffers each stage from the next, so cascaded stages do not load one another and the overall transfer function is simply the product of each stage's individual transfer function — a property passive RLC filters do not have.
Part (b) — $R_{in}$, $R_{out}$. With ideal op-amps, each op-amp's input terminals draw zero current (infinite input impedance) and each op-amp's output behaves as an ideal voltage source (zero output impedance) even after feedback is applied. Since $R_{in}$ and $R_{out}$ are marked at op-amp input/output nodes in Figure P3:
$$R_{in}=\boxed{\infty}\qquad R_{out}=\boxed{0\ \Omega}$$
Part (c) — deriving $F(s)$.Stage 1: in Figure P3, $V_1$ feeds a capacitor $C$ into node $V_x$; from $V_x$ a second $C$ goes to the op-amp’s $+$ input (node $V_+$), which returns to ground through $R$ (current $I_3$), and a resistor $R$ runs from $V_x$ to the output $V_2$ (current $I_2$). The op-amp is a unity-gain follower, so $V_+=V_2$, and its $+$ input draws no current.
KCL at $V_+$ (current through the second $C$ = current $I_3$ in $R$ to ground):
$$sC(V_x-V_2)=\frac{V_2}{R}\ \Rightarrow\ V_x=V_2\,\frac{1+sRC}{sRC}$$
KCL at $V_x$ (current $I_1$ in from $V_1$ = current on through the second $C$ + current $I_2$ through $R$ to the output):
$$sC(V_1-V_x)=sC(V_x-V_2)+\frac{V_x-V_2}{R}$$
With $x=sRC$, the first equation gives $V_x-V_2=V_2/x$; multiplying the second by $R$ gives $x(V_1-V_x)=(1+x)V_2/x$, so
$$xV_1=xV_x+\frac{(1+x)V_2}{x}=(1+x)V_2+\frac{(1+x)V_2}{x}=\frac{(1+x)^2}{x}\,V_2\ \Rightarrow\ \frac{V_2}{V_1}=\frac{x^2}{(1+x)^2}$$
Substituting $x=sRC=s/\omega_o$ with $\omega_o=1/RC$:
$$H_1(s)=\frac{V_2(s)}{V_1(s)}=\frac{s^2}{s^2+\dfrac{2}{RC}s+\dfrac{1}{(RC)^2}}=\frac{s^2}{s^2+2\omega_os+\omega_o^2},\qquad\omega_o=\frac{1}{RC}$$
Stage 2: a standard non-inverting amplifier with gain-setting resistors $R$ (to ground) and $9R$ (feedback):
$$H_2(s)=\frac{V_3(s)}{V_2(s)}=1+\frac{9R}{R}=10$$
Multiplying the two stages (they do not load each other, since the op-amp output driving Stage 2 is ideal):
$$F(s)=H_1(s)H_2(s)=\boxed{\dfrac{10s^2}{s^2+2\omega_os+\omega_o^2}}\qquad\checkmark$$
Part (d) — magnitude and phase at $\omega=0.5\omega_o$. Let $x=s/\omega_o=j0.5$ (normalizing frequency to $\omega_o$):
$$\frac{F(j\omega)}{10}=\frac{x^2}{x^2+2x+1}=\frac{(j0.5)^2}{(j0.5)^2+2(j0.5)+1}=\frac{-0.25}{0.75+j1.0}$$
The denominator has magnitude $\sqrt{0.75^2+1^2}=1.25$ and phase $\arctan(1/0.75)=53.13^\circ$; the numerator is real and negative (magnitude 0.25, phase $180^\circ$):
$$\left|\frac{F}{10}\right|=\frac{0.25}{1.25}=0.2\ \Rightarrow\ |F|=10(0.2)=\boxed{2.0}\quad\Rightarrow\quad 20\log_{10}(2.0)=\boxed{6.02\ \text{dB}}$$
$$\angle F=180^\circ-53.13^\circ=\boxed{126.87^\circ}$$
(the $\times10$ gain factor is real and positive, so it does not shift the phase.)
Check
Expanding $(1+x)^2=x^2+2x+1$ reproduces the target denominator term by term; the double pole at $s=-\omega_o$ ($Q=0.5$) is the equal-component unity-gain Sallen-Key high-pass. Limits check: $F\to10$ as $\omega\to\infty$ and $F\propto s^2\to0$ at DC, as a second-order high-pass must behave.