Question 6 of 8: Frame by the slope-deflection method
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Examinations,
May 2015 — 07-Str-A1 Elementary Structural Analysis. Three hours,
CLOSED BOOK, an approved Sharp or Casio calculator permitted. Six questions
constitute a complete paper: answer ALL of Questions 1 to 5 and ONE of
Questions 6, 7 or 8. Marks are shown in the left margin
(6 + 18 + 16 + 18 + 20 + 22 = 100). All eight questions are solved below,
because the three alternatives exercise quite different methods —
slope-deflection, virtual work and the statics of a three-hinged frame —
and the complete set is the more useful study resource.
Reference texts.
R. C. Hibbeler, Structural Analysis, 10th ed. — Ch. 2
(determinacy and stability), Ch. 3–5 (trusses, internal loadings, frames),
Ch. 6 (influence lines), Ch. 8–9 (deflections and virtual work),
Ch. 11 (slope-deflection).
A. Kassimali, Structural Analysis, 6th ed. — Ch. 3
(equilibrium and determinacy), Ch. 4 (plane trusses), Ch. 5 (beams and frames),
Ch. 7 (deflections by the method of virtual work), Ch. 8–9 (influence
lines), Ch. 16 (slope-deflection).
K. Leet, C.-M. Uang and A. Gilbert, Fundamentals of Structural
Analysis, 5th ed. — a parallel treatment of the same syllabus.
C. H. Norris, J. B. Wilbur and S. Utku, Elementary Structural
Analysis, 4th ed. — the classical text this exam code is named
after.
Check: every support type, hinge and member below
was read off the drawings, not off the printed text. In this subject the text carries almost no data: spans, loads, support types and hinge positions exist only in the hand-drawn figures. The classification in Question 1 in particular turns
entirely on telling a pin (plain triangle on hatching) from a roller (triangle
over two rollers) and a rigid joint from an internal hinge (small open
circle).
Question 6: Frame by the slope-deflection method (22 marks)
Given. A horizontal beam 20 m long measured from its free
left end, on a roller at node 1 ($x = 4$ m), continuing through node 2
($x = 12$ m) to a built-in end at node 3 ($x = 20$ m). A column 8 m long hangs
from node 2 down to a pinned base at node 4. A uniform load of 8 kN/m covers the
beam from the free end to node 2, and a 72 kN point load acts at $x = 16$ m,
which is the mid-span of member 2–3. All members share the same $EI$ and
are inextensible.
Find. The end moments, all reactions, and the shear force and
bending moment diagrams with their extreme ordinates.
Figure 10 — frame 6: geometry
and loading, the shear force and bending moment diagrams for the beam, and the
bending moment in the column plotted separately along the column
axis.
Approach. Show first that the frame cannot sway, so the only
unknowns are the rotations at the roller (node 1) and at the beam–column
joint (node 2). Write slope-deflection equations for the three members, using the
modified stiffness for the pin-ended column, and solve two simultaneous
equations.
Rule out sidesway. The beam is horizontal and inextensible,
and node 3 is built in, so nodes 1 and 2 cannot translate horizontally. The
column is vertical and inextensible and its base is pinned, so node 2 cannot
translate vertically, and the roller holds node 1 vertically. Every joint is
therefore fixed in position and the chord rotations $\psi$ all vanish. Only
$\theta_1$ and $\theta_2$ remain unknown, because $\theta_3 = 0$ at the built-in
end and the pinned base is handled by the modified stiffness.
Deal with the overhang. The 4 m length to the left of the
roller is a cantilever carrying 8 kN/m. It applies a known hogging moment at
node 1,
$$ M_{\text{over}} = -\tfrac{1}{2}(8)(4)^2 = \boxed{-64\ \text{kN}\!\cdot\!\text{m}} $$
and a known downward force of 32 kN. Because the overhang has no rotational
stiffness of its own, it must never be given a share of any balancing moment; it
simply sets the boundary condition $M_{12} = -64$ kN·m.
Fixed-end moments. For member 1–2 ($L = 8$ m,
$w = 8$ kN/m) the standard values are
$\mathrm{FEM}_{12} = -wL^2/12 = -42.67$ kN·m and
$\mathrm{FEM}_{21} = +42.67$ kN·m. For member 2–3 ($L = 8$ m with a
72 kN load at mid-span) they are
$\mathrm{FEM}_{23} = -PL/8 = -72$ kN·m and
$\mathrm{FEM}_{32} = +72$ kN·m. The unloaded column has none.
Slope-deflection equations. With clockwise end moments
positive and $\psi = 0$ throughout,
$$ M_{ij} = \frac{2EI}{L}\left(2\theta_i + \theta_j\right) + \mathrm{FEM}_{ij} $$
for the two beam members, while the pin-ended column uses the modified form
$M_{24} = (3EI/L)\theta_2$ with $M_{42} = 0$.
Impose the two conditions. The boundary condition at node 1
is $M_{12} = -64$, that is
$$ 0.25EI\left(2\theta_1 + \theta_2\right) - 42.67 = -64 $$
and joint 2 must balance, $M_{21} + M_{23} + M_{24} = 0$, that is
$$ 0.25EI\left(2\theta_2 + \theta_1\right) + 42.67 + 0.5EI\theta_2 - 72
+ 0.375EI\theta_2 = 0 . $$
Solving the pair,
$$ \boxed{EI\theta_1 = -58.67,\qquad EI\theta_2 = +32.0\ \text{kN}\!\cdot\!\text{m}^2} $$
Back-substitute for the end moments.
$$ M_{21} = +44.0, \quad M_{23} = -56.0, \quad M_{24} = +12.0, \quad
M_{32} = +80.0\ \text{kN}\!\cdot\!\text{m} $$
with $M_{12} = -64.0$ kN·m as imposed. Joint 2 checks exactly:
$44 - 56 + 12 = 0$. As an independent check the same frame was re-solved by
direct stiffness, treating the members as inextensible bars with rotational and
translational freedoms; the end moments agree to three figures.
Member end shears. For a member carrying a uniform load,
$V_{\text{near}} = (M_{\text{far}} - M_{\text{near}} + wL^2/2)/L$ with the end
moments expressed as sagging bending moments. For member 1–2 that gives
$$ V_1 = \frac{-44 + 64 + \tfrac{1}{2}(8)(8)^2}{8} = \boxed{34.5\ \text{kN}} $$
falling to $-29.5$ kN at node 2, with zero shear at $34.5/8 = 4.31$ m from node 1.
For member 2–3 with the mid-span load,
$V_2 = (-80 + 56 + 72\times4)/8 = 33.0$ kN, falling to $-39.0$ kN at node 3. The
column carries a constant shear of $12/8 = 1.5$ kN.
Reactions. The roller carries the span shear plus the
overhang, $34.5 + 32 = \boxed{66.5\ \text{kN}\ (\uparrow)}$. The column takes
the two beam shears meeting at node 2,
$29.5 + 33.0 = \boxed{62.5\ \text{kN}}$, delivered to the pin at node 4 together
with a horizontal thrust of 1.5 kN. The built-in end carries
$\boxed{39.0\ \text{kN}\ (\uparrow)}$, a horizontal force of 1.5 kN and a
fixing moment of $\boxed{80.0\ \text{kN}\!\cdot\!\text{m}}$. The three vertical
reactions total 168 kN, exactly the applied
$8(12) + 72 = 168$ kN.
Diagram ordinates. The bending moment runs from zero at the
free end to $-64$ kN·m at the roller, rises to a sagging peak of
$$ M_{\max} = -64 + 34.5(4.3125) - 4(4.3125)^2 = \boxed{+10.4\ \text{kN}\!\cdot\!\text{m}} $$
at 4.31 m past the roller, returns to $-44$ kN·m just left of node 2, steps
to $-56$ kN·m just right of it (the column takes the 12 kN·m
difference), rises to $+76$ kN·m under the 72 kN load and falls to
$-80$ kN·m at the built-in end. The column moment falls linearly from
12 kN·m at node 2 to zero at the pin.
Question 6 — end moments, reactions and extreme ordinates
Quantity
Value
$M_{12}$ (overhang, imposed)
−64.0 kN·m
$M_{21}$ / $M_{23}$ / $M_{24}$
+44.0 / −56.0 / +12.0 kN·m
$M_{32}$ (fixing moment at node 3)
+80.0 kN·m
Roller reaction at node 1
66.5 kN upward
Pin at node 4
62.5 kN upward, 1.5 kN horizontal
Built-in end at node 3
39.0 kN upward, 1.5 kN horizontal, 80.0 kN·m
Maximum shear (beam)
+34.5 kN at node 1; −39.0 kN at node 3
Maximum sagging moment
+76.0 kN·m under the 72 kN load
Maximum hogging moment
−80.0 kN·m at the built-in end
Column 2–4
12.0 kN·m at node 2 to zero at the pin; shear 1.5 kN