Question 7 of 8: Deflection of a tie-rod-supported beam by virtual work
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Examinations,
May 2015 — 07-Str-A1 Elementary Structural Analysis. Three hours,
CLOSED BOOK, an approved Sharp or Casio calculator permitted. Six questions
constitute a complete paper: answer ALL of Questions 1 to 5 and ONE of
Questions 6, 7 or 8. Marks are shown in the left margin
(6 + 18 + 16 + 18 + 20 + 22 = 100). All eight questions are solved below,
because the three alternatives exercise quite different methods —
slope-deflection, virtual work and the statics of a three-hinged frame —
and the complete set is the more useful study resource.
Reference texts.
R. C. Hibbeler, Structural Analysis, 10th ed. — Ch. 2
(determinacy and stability), Ch. 3–5 (trusses, internal loadings, frames),
Ch. 6 (influence lines), Ch. 8–9 (deflections and virtual work),
Ch. 11 (slope-deflection).
A. Kassimali, Structural Analysis, 6th ed. — Ch. 3
(equilibrium and determinacy), Ch. 4 (plane trusses), Ch. 5 (beams and frames),
Ch. 7 (deflections by the method of virtual work), Ch. 8–9 (influence
lines), Ch. 16 (slope-deflection).
K. Leet, C.-M. Uang and A. Gilbert, Fundamentals of Structural
Analysis, 5th ed. — a parallel treatment of the same syllabus.
C. H. Norris, J. B. Wilbur and S. Utku, Elementary Structural
Analysis, 4th ed. — the classical text this exam code is named
after.
Check: every support type, hinge and member below
was read off the drawings, not off the printed text. In this subject the text carries almost no data: spans, loads, support types and hinge positions exist only in the hand-drawn figures. The classification in Question 1 in particular turns
entirely on telling a pin (plain triangle on hatching) from a roller (triangle
over two rollers) and a rigid joint from an internal hinge (small open
circle).
Question 7: Deflection of a tie-rod-supported beam by virtual work (22 marks)
Given. A horizontal beam pinned to a wall at point 1
$(0,\,0)$ and running 9 m to a free end at point 4. A 48 kN downward load acts
at point 2, 3 m from the pin; a tie rod runs from point 3, 6 m from the pin, up
to a second wall pin at point 5, 8 m above point 1. The beam has
$EI = 36\,000$ kN·m$^2$ and is inextensible; the tie rod has
$EA = 25\,000$ kN.
Given data — Question 7
Quantity
Value
Beam
1–4, 9 m long, pinned at 1, free at 4
Load
48 kN downward at point 2, $x = 3$ m
Tie rod
3 $(6,0)$ to 5 $(0,8)$, length 10 m
$EI$ (beam)
36 000 kN·m$^2$
$EA$ (tie)
25 000 kN
Find. (a) The vertical deflection at point 4. (b) The
vertical deflection at point 2 when the same 48 kN load is moved to point 4.
Figure 11 — the tie-rod-supported
beam of Question 7 and its bending moment diagram. The moment is zero from the
tie-rod attachment at point 3 to the free end at point 4.
Check: the beam 1–4 is read as a single
straight prismatic member. The printed figure shows one straight horizontal line from point 1 to point 4, with the tie rod anchored at the upper wall pin. The phrase "both beams" in the question stem is taken to mean the two lengths 1–3 and 3–4, which share the same $EI$. Nothing in the arithmetic depends on the reading,
because both lengths are in the single integral below.
Approach. The structure is determinate — two pin
reactions and the tie force against three equations — so find the real
bending moments and tie force by statics, repeat with a unit load at point 4,
and combine the bending and axial contributions.
For a structure containing both flexural and axial members the unit-load
statement is
where $M$ and $N$ come from the real loading and $m$ and $n$ from a unit load
placed at and along the required displacement. Because the beam is stated to be
inextensible, its axial force does no work and only the tie rod appears in the
second sum.
Real tie force. The tie runs from $(6,0)$ to $(0,8)$, so its
length is 10 m and its direction cosines are $-0.6$ and $+0.8$. Taking moments
about the pin at point 1,
$$ 0.8\,T(6) = 48(3) \;\Rightarrow\; \boxed{T = 30.0\ \text{kN (tension)}} $$
Real reactions. Resolving,
$H_1 = 0.6(30) = \boxed{18.0\ \text{kN}}$ and
$V_1 = 48 - 0.8(30) = \boxed{24.0\ \text{kN}\ (\uparrow)}$.
Real bending moment. From the pin,
$M = 24x$ up to the load, so $M(3) = 72$ kN·m; from the load to the tie,
$M = 144 - 24x$, which vanishes at $x = 6$ m; and beyond the tie the beam is
unloaded, so $M \equiv 0$ from point 3 to the free end.
Virtual system. Remove the 48 kN load and apply 1 kN
downward at point 4. Moments about the pin give
$0.8\,t(6) = 1(9)$, so $t = 1.875$, and the virtual vertical reaction is
$1 - 0.8(1.875) = -0.5$ kN, that is 0.5 kN downward. Hence
$m = -0.5x$ from 0 to 6 m and $m = x - 9$ from 6 m to the free end, which is
zero at point 4 as it must be.
Flexural contribution. Only the length 0 to 6 m carries real
moment, so
$$ \int_0^3 (24x)(-0.5x)\,\mathrm{d}x + \int_3^6 (144-24x)(-0.5x)\,\mathrm{d}x
= -108 - 216 = -324\ \text{kN}^2\!\cdot\!\text{m}^3 $$
and dividing by $EI$,
$$ \Delta_{\text{bending}} = \frac{-324}{36\,000} = \boxed{-9.0\ \text{mm}} $$
the negative sign meaning that bending alone lifts point 4, which is right: the
span 1–3 sags, so its tangent at the prop rotates and the unloaded
cantilever beyond swings upward.
Axial contribution of the tie.
$$ \Delta_{\text{tie}} = \frac{N n L}{EA} = \frac{30(1.875)(10)}{25\,000}
= \boxed{+22.5\ \text{mm}} $$
Independent check of the tie term. The tie stretches by
$TL/(EA) = 30(10)/25\,000 = 12$ mm. Since the beam is inextensible and pinned at
point 1, point 3 must move so that its component along the tie equals that
stretch; the tie makes an angle whose vertical cosine is 0.8, so point 3 drops
$12/0.8 = 15$ mm. Point 4, being on the same rigid line 9 m from the pin, drops
$15 \times 9/6 = 22.5$ mm, exactly the axial term computed above.
(b) The reciprocal case. Maxwell's reciprocal theorem states
that for a linearly elastic structure the displacement at $A$ due to a load at
$B$ equals the displacement at $B$ due to the same load at $A$. Hence the
vertical deflection at point 2 caused by 48 kN at point 4 is the same as the
deflection at point 4 caused by 48 kN at point 2:
$$ \boxed{\Delta_2 = 13.5\ \text{mm downward}} $$
No further analysis is required, and the marks for part (b) are for saying
exactly that.
Question 7 — results
Quantity
Value
Tie force
30.0 kN tension
Reaction at pin 1
18.0 kN horizontal, 24.0 kN upward
Maximum bending moment (at point 2)
72.0 kN·m sagging
Virtual tie force for a unit load at 4
1.875 kN
Flexural contribution to $\Delta_4$
−9.0 mm (upward)
Tie contribution to $\Delta_4$
+22.5 mm (downward)
(a) Vertical deflection at point 4
13.5 mm downward
(b) Vertical deflection at point 2 with the load at 4