16-Civ-B2 Advanced Structural Design · December 2016
Question 2 of 7: Two-span welded plate girder — flexure, shear and interaction (12 + 6 + 2 marks)
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. 98-Civ-B2 Advanced Structural Design,
December 2016, three hours, closed book (design handbooks and textbooks are permitted,
no notes). Seven design questions; any five constitute a complete paper and all
questions are of equal value (20 marks each). Because the whole paper is a study
resource, all seven questions are solved here. Page 1 states that all
loads shown on the figures are unfactored, and supplies the design data used
throughout.
Reference texts.
CSA S16:19, Design of Steel Structures — Clauses 11 (classification),
13.4 (shear), 13.5 (bending), 13.7 (bracing for plastic design), 13.8 (axial
compression and bending), 14 (plate girders), 17 (composite beams).
CISC, Handbook of Steel Construction, 12th ed. — section properties and
the beam-column selection tables.
National Building Code of Canada 2020, Part 4 — load combinations.
M. P. Collins and D. Mitchell, Prestressed Concrete Structures —
permissible-stress design and tendon-zone construction.
R. C. Hibbeler, Structural Analysis, 10th ed. — continuous-beam and
rigid-frame analysis.
Design data (page 1 of the examination paper)
Quantity
Symbol
Value
Concrete
f'c
30 MPa
Structural steel
Fy
350 MPa
Reinforcing bar
fy
400 MPa
Prestressed concrete at transfer
fci
35 MPa
Prestressed concrete
f'c
50 MPa
Modular ratio
n
6
Strand tensile strength
fult
1750 MPa
Strand yield strength
fy
1450 MPa
Initial strand stress
finitial
1200 MPa
Loss of prestress
Δfp
240 MPa
Effective strand stress
fse = 1200 − 240
960 MPa
Check — load factors. Page 1 says only that
“all loads shown are unfactored”; it gives no dead/live split, so no NBCC
combination can be formed exactly. Every solution below applies a single factor of
1.5 to the loads printed on the figures and 1.25 to
self weight that the solver itself introduces (girder, slab, frame members), and states
that assumption where it is used. The choice scales the required resistances but changes
neither the collapse mechanisms, the section classifications, nor any interaction
ratio, so the engineering conclusions are unaffected. Serviceability checks
(prestress stresses, deflections, bearing pressure) use the unfactored loads as
printed.
Given. A welded plate girder continuous over two 12 m
spans, each span carrying two 400 kN loads at its third points, with lateral support to
the compression flange at 2 m intervals and no intermediate transverse web
stiffeners.
Question data
Quantity
Symbol
Value
Span, each of two
L
12 m
Applied loads, each span
P
400 kN at 4 m and 8 m
Factored loads
1.5P
600 kN
Lateral support spacing
Lb
2 m
Steel
Fy
350 MPa
Web stiffening
—
bearing stiffeners only
Find. Web and flange plate sizes that satisfy flexure,
shear and the shear-moment interaction rule at the interior support, where both actions
peak together.
Figure 2 — two-span continuous girder, 12 m spans, four 400 kN loads at the third points of each span.
Approach. Analyse the continuous beam elastically for
the support moment, then choose a web whose unstiffened shear buckling resistance
carries the support shear, keep the web slenderness inside the Class 3 limit so the
flexural resistance is not reduced, and close with the Clause 14.6 interaction
check.
Analyse the continuous beam. With equal spans and identical
loading, the three-moment equation applied to the simple-span moment diagram (area
$19\,200$ kN·m2, centroid at mid-span) gives
$$2M_B(2L)=-6\left(\frac{A\bar{x}}{L}+\frac{A\bar{x}}{L}\right)
\ \Rightarrow\ M_B=\boxed{-2400\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}}$$
The end reaction is then $R_A=600+M_B/L=400$ kN, so the span moments are
$M(4\,\text{m})=1600$ kN·m and $M(8\,\text{m})=800$ kN·m, and the shear
just inside the interior support is
$$V_B=400-2(600)=\boxed{-800\ \text{kN}}$$
Hogging at B therefore governs flexure and coincides with the peak shear.
Choose a web on the unstiffened shear resistance. With no
intermediate stiffeners the aspect ratio is unbounded, so $k_v=5.34$ and $k_a=0$.
Trying a 1200 mm by 12 mm web, $h/w=100$, which exceeds
$621\sqrt{k_v/F_y}=76.7$, so shear buckling is elastic:
$$F_s=F_{cre}=\frac{180\,000\,k_v}{(h/w)^2}=\frac{180\,000(5.34)}{100^2}
=96.1\ \text{MPa}$$
$$V_r=\phi A_wF_s=0.9(1200\times12)(96.1)=\boxed{1246\ \text{kN}}\ \ge\ 800\ \text{kN}$$
Proportion the flanges and classify the section. Trying
300 mm by 20 mm flanges, the overall depth is 1240 mm and
$$I=\frac{12(1200)^3}{12}+2\left[\frac{300(20)^3}{12}+6000(610)^2\right]
=6194\times10^6\ \text{mm}^4,\qquad S=\frac{I}{620}=9.99\times10^6\ \text{mm}^3$$
The flange projection gives $b/2t=7.50\le145/\sqrt{350}=7.75$, so the flange is
Class 1; the web at $h/w=100$ is just inside the Class 3 limit
$1900/\sqrt{F_y}=101.6$. The section is therefore Class 3 overall and the elastic
resistance governs:
$$M_r=\phi SF_y=0.9(9.99\times10^6)(350)=\boxed{3147\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}}$$
Add the girder self weight. The plate area is
$26\,400$ mm2, i.e. 2.03 kN/m, factored to 2.54 kN/m. On a two-span
continuous beam a uniform load contributes $wL^2/8$ at the interior support and
$0.625wL$ to the shear there, so
$$M_f=2400+45.7=\boxed{2446\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}},\qquad
V_f=800+19.1=\boxed{819\ \text{kN}}$$
Both remain inside the resistances found above, at 78 and 66 per cent
respectively.
Check the plate-girder flexural reduction. Clause 14.3.4
reduces $M_r$ only when the web is more slender than
$$\frac{1900}{\sqrt{M_f/(\phi S)}}=\frac{1900}{\sqrt{2446\times10^6/(0.9\times9.99\times10^6)}}
=115.2$$
Since $h/w=100<115.2$, no reduction applies — the reason for holding
the web at 1200 mm by 12 mm rather than going thinner and deeper.
Apply the shear-moment interaction rule. At the interior
support both ratios are high enough to trigger Clause 14.6:
$$0.727\frac{M_f}{M_r}+0.455\frac{V_f}{V_r}
=0.727(0.777)+0.455(0.658)=\boxed{0.864}\ \le\ 1.0$$
The girder therefore has 14 per cent reserve in the combined action, which is the
controlling check for a non-stiffened web.
Check the sagging region and the bearings. The largest sagging
moment, $1625$ kN·m at 4 m from an end support, is only 52 per cent of $M_r$,
so the uniform section is adequate throughout. The factored interior reaction is
$R_B=1638$ kN, against a web bearing resistance of only
$$B_r=\phi_{bi}w(N+10t)F_y=0.80(12)(200+200)(350)=1344\ \text{kN}$$
so bearing stiffeners are required at the interior support; the end
reactions of 411 kN are carried by the web alone. Interior web crippling under the
600 kN point loads gives $B_r=1398$ kN, so no stiffeners are needed there.
Designed plate girder — 1200 × 12 mm web with 300 × 20 mm flanges, overall depth 1240 mm, no intermediate stiffeners.
Elastic bending-moment diagram for the factored point loads: hogging 2400 kN·m over the interior support governs the design.