NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

16-Civ-B2 Advanced Structural Design · December 2016

Question 2 of 7: Two-span welded plate girder — flexure, shear and interaction (12 + 6 + 2 marks)

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. 98-Civ-B2 Advanced Structural Design, December 2016, three hours, closed book (design handbooks and textbooks are permitted, no notes). Seven design questions; any five constitute a complete paper and all questions are of equal value (20 marks each). Because the whole paper is a study resource, all seven questions are solved here. Page 1 states that all loads shown on the figures are unfactored, and supplies the design data used throughout.

Reference texts.

Design data (page 1 of the examination paper)
QuantitySymbolValue
Concretef'c30 MPa
Structural steelFy350 MPa
Reinforcing barfy400 MPa
Prestressed concrete at transferfci35 MPa
Prestressed concretef'c50 MPa
Modular ration6
Strand tensile strengthfult1750 MPa
Strand yield strengthfy1450 MPa
Initial strand stressfinitial1200 MPa
Loss of prestressΔfp240 MPa
Effective strand stressfse = 1200 − 240960 MPa
Check — load factors. Page 1 says only that “all loads shown are unfactored”; it gives no dead/live split, so no NBCC combination can be formed exactly. Every solution below applies a single factor of 1.5 to the loads printed on the figures and 1.25 to self weight that the solver itself introduces (girder, slab, frame members), and states that assumption where it is used. The choice scales the required resistances but changes neither the collapse mechanisms, the section classifications, nor any interaction ratio, so the engineering conclusions are unaffected. Serviceability checks (prestress stresses, deflections, bearing pressure) use the unfactored loads as printed.

Question 2: Two-span welded plate girder — flexure, shear and interaction (12 + 6 + 2 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. A welded plate girder continuous over two 12 m spans, each span carrying two 400 kN loads at its third points, with lateral support to the compression flange at 2 m intervals and no intermediate transverse web stiffeners.

Question data
QuantitySymbolValue
Span, each of twoL12 m
Applied loads, each spanP400 kN at 4 m and 8 m
Factored loads1.5P600 kN
Lateral support spacingLb2 m
SteelFy350 MPa
Web stiffening—bearing stiffeners only

Find. Web and flange plate sizes that satisfy flexure, shear and the shear-moment interaction rule at the interior support, where both actions peak together.

400 kN400 kN400 kN400 kNABC4 m4 m4 m4 m4 m4 m12 m12 mNOTE: lateral support provided at 2 m intervals
Figure 2 — two-span continuous girder, 12 m spans, four 400 kN loads at the third points of each span.

Approach. Analyse the continuous beam elastically for the support moment, then choose a web whose unstiffened shear buckling resistance carries the support shear, keep the web slenderness inside the Class 3 limit so the flexural resistance is not reduced, and close with the Clause 14.6 interaction check.

  1. Analyse the continuous beam. With equal spans and identical loading, the three-moment equation applied to the simple-span moment diagram (area $19\,200$ kN·m2, centroid at mid-span) gives $$2M_B(2L)=-6\left(\frac{A\bar{x}}{L}+\frac{A\bar{x}}{L}\right) \ \Rightarrow\ M_B=\boxed{-2400\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}}$$ The end reaction is then $R_A=600+M_B/L=400$ kN, so the span moments are $M(4\,\text{m})=1600$ kN·m and $M(8\,\text{m})=800$ kN·m, and the shear just inside the interior support is $$V_B=400-2(600)=\boxed{-800\ \text{kN}}$$ Hogging at B therefore governs flexure and coincides with the peak shear.
  2. Choose a web on the unstiffened shear resistance. With no intermediate stiffeners the aspect ratio is unbounded, so $k_v=5.34$ and $k_a=0$. Trying a 1200 mm by 12 mm web, $h/w=100$, which exceeds $621\sqrt{k_v/F_y}=76.7$, so shear buckling is elastic: $$F_s=F_{cre}=\frac{180\,000\,k_v}{(h/w)^2}=\frac{180\,000(5.34)}{100^2} =96.1\ \text{MPa}$$ $$V_r=\phi A_wF_s=0.9(1200\times12)(96.1)=\boxed{1246\ \text{kN}}\ \ge\ 800\ \text{kN}$$
  3. Proportion the flanges and classify the section. Trying 300 mm by 20 mm flanges, the overall depth is 1240 mm and $$I=\frac{12(1200)^3}{12}+2\left[\frac{300(20)^3}{12}+6000(610)^2\right] =6194\times10^6\ \text{mm}^4,\qquad S=\frac{I}{620}=9.99\times10^6\ \text{mm}^3$$ The flange projection gives $b/2t=7.50\le145/\sqrt{350}=7.75$, so the flange is Class 1; the web at $h/w=100$ is just inside the Class 3 limit $1900/\sqrt{F_y}=101.6$. The section is therefore Class 3 overall and the elastic resistance governs: $$M_r=\phi SF_y=0.9(9.99\times10^6)(350)=\boxed{3147\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}}$$
  4. Add the girder self weight. The plate area is $26\,400$ mm2, i.e. 2.03 kN/m, factored to 2.54 kN/m. On a two-span continuous beam a uniform load contributes $wL^2/8$ at the interior support and $0.625wL$ to the shear there, so $$M_f=2400+45.7=\boxed{2446\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}},\qquad V_f=800+19.1=\boxed{819\ \text{kN}}$$ Both remain inside the resistances found above, at 78 and 66 per cent respectively.
  5. Check the plate-girder flexural reduction. Clause 14.3.4 reduces $M_r$ only when the web is more slender than $$\frac{1900}{\sqrt{M_f/(\phi S)}}=\frac{1900}{\sqrt{2446\times10^6/(0.9\times9.99\times10^6)}} =115.2$$ Since $h/w=100<115.2$, no reduction applies — the reason for holding the web at 1200 mm by 12 mm rather than going thinner and deeper.
  6. Apply the shear-moment interaction rule. At the interior support both ratios are high enough to trigger Clause 14.6: $$0.727\frac{M_f}{M_r}+0.455\frac{V_f}{V_r} =0.727(0.777)+0.455(0.658)=\boxed{0.864}\ \le\ 1.0$$ The girder therefore has 14 per cent reserve in the combined action, which is the controlling check for a non-stiffened web.
  7. Check the sagging region and the bearings. The largest sagging moment, $1625$ kN·m at 4 m from an end support, is only 52 per cent of $M_r$, so the uniform section is adequate throughout. The factored interior reaction is $R_B=1638$ kN, against a web bearing resistance of only $$B_r=\phi_{bi}w(N+10t)F_y=0.80(12)(200+200)(350)=1344\ \text{kN}$$ so bearing stiffeners are required at the interior support; the end reactions of 411 kN are carried by the web alone. Interior web crippling under the 600 kN point loads gives $B_r=1398$ kN, so no stiffeners are needed there.
300 mm1240 mm20 mm20 mmweb 1200 x 12 mmcontinuous fillet welds, web unstiffened between bearings
Designed plate girder — 1200 × 12 mm web with 300 × 20 mm flanges, overall depth 1240 mm, no intermediate stiffeners.
160080024008001600Factored bending moment, two-span continuous girdervalues in kN·m0sagging plotted below the axis
Elastic bending-moment diagram for the factored point loads: hogging 2400 kN·m over the interior support governs the design.
Final results
QuantityResult
Web plate1200 mm × 12 mm, unstiffened between bearings
Flange plates300 mm × 20 mm (Class 1)
Overall depth1240 mm; S = 9.99 × 106 mm3
Design actions at support BMf = 2446 kN·m, Vf = 819 kN
Flexural resistanceMr = 3147 kN·m (Class 3, elastic)
Shear resistanceVr = 1246 kN (Fs = 96.1 MPa)
Interaction, Clause 14.60.864 ≤ 1.0
Stiffenersbearing stiffeners at the interior support only