16-Civ-B2 Advanced Structural Design · December 2016
Question 7 of 7: Reinforced-concrete tee beam — member AB (14 + 6 marks)
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. 98-Civ-B2 Advanced Structural Design,
December 2016, three hours, closed book (design handbooks and textbooks are permitted,
no notes). Seven design questions; any five constitute a complete paper and all
questions are of equal value (20 marks each). Because the whole paper is a study
resource, all seven questions are solved here. Page 1 states that all
loads shown on the figures are unfactored, and supplies the design data used
throughout.
Reference texts.
CSA S16:19, Design of Steel Structures — Clauses 11 (classification),
13.4 (shear), 13.5 (bending), 13.7 (bracing for plastic design), 13.8 (axial
compression and bending), 14 (plate girders), 17 (composite beams).
CISC, Handbook of Steel Construction, 12th ed. — section properties and
the beam-column selection tables.
National Building Code of Canada 2020, Part 4 — load combinations.
M. P. Collins and D. Mitchell, Prestressed Concrete Structures —
permissible-stress design and tendon-zone construction.
R. C. Hibbeler, Structural Analysis, 10th ed. — continuous-beam and
rigid-frame analysis.
Design data (page 1 of the examination paper)
Quantity
Symbol
Value
Concrete
f'c
30 MPa
Structural steel
Fy
350 MPa
Reinforcing bar
fy
400 MPa
Prestressed concrete at transfer
fci
35 MPa
Prestressed concrete
f'c
50 MPa
Modular ratio
n
6
Strand tensile strength
fult
1750 MPa
Strand yield strength
fy
1450 MPa
Initial strand stress
finitial
1200 MPa
Loss of prestress
Δfp
240 MPa
Effective strand stress
fse = 1200 − 240
960 MPa
Check — load factors. Page 1 says only that
“all loads shown are unfactored”; it gives no dead/live split, so no NBCC
combination can be formed exactly. Every solution below applies a single factor of
1.5 to the loads printed on the figures and 1.25 to
self weight that the solver itself introduces (girder, slab, frame members), and states
that assumption where it is used. The choice scales the required resistances but changes
neither the collapse mechanisms, the section classifications, nor any interaction
ratio, so the engineering conclusions are unaffected. Serviceability checks
(prestress stresses, deflections, bearing pressure) use the unfactored loads as
printed.
Question 7: Reinforced-concrete tee beam — member AB (14 + 6 marks)
Given. The Figure 2 beam, now in reinforced concrete:
span AB of 12 m, continuous over support B, carrying two 400 kN loads at 4 m and 8 m, cast
monolithically with a floor slab so that the section acts as a tee.
Question data and assumed section
Quantity
Symbol
Value
Span AB
L
12 m (continuous at B)
Applied loads
P
400 kN at 4 m and 8 m → 600 kN factored
Web
bw × h
500 mm × 1600 mm
Slab (assumed)
hf
150 mm, beams at 3.0 m centres
Effective flange width
beff
500 + 2(1200) = 2900 mm
Beam self weight
w
0.5 × 1.45 × 24 = 17.4 → 21.75 kN/m factored
Materials
f'c / fy
30 / 400 MPa
Find. The flexural steel at mid-span and over the
interior support, the stirrup arrangement, and the curtailment layout along AB.
Tee cross-section for member AB — 500 mm web, 1600 mm overall depth, 2900 mm effective flange.
Approach. The flange is in compression at mid-span and
in tension over the support, so the two regions behave quite differently: a very wide,
lightly stressed tee at mid-span and a plain 500 mm rectangle at the support. Analyse
elastically for the envelope, design each region on its own behaviour, then set the
curtailment from the point of inflection.
Analyse the continuous beam including self weight. The point
loads give $M_B=-2400$ kN·m as in Question 2, and the factored self weight
adds $w_fL^2/8$:
$$M_B=-2400-\frac{21.75(12)^2}{8}=\boxed{-2791.5\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}}$$
$$R_A=\left(\frac{600(8)+600(4)}{12}+\frac{21.75(12)}{2}\right)+\frac{M_B}{12}
=497.9\ \text{kN}$$
so the largest sagging moment sits under the first load,
$$M(4\ \text{m})=497.9(4)-\frac{21.75(4)^2}{2}=\boxed{1817.5\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}}$$
and the shear just inside B is
$V_f=|497.9-1200-261|=\boxed{963\ \text{kN}}$.
Fix the effective flange width. Clause 10.3.3 limits the
overhang each side to the least of a tenth of the span, twelve slab thicknesses and
half the clear distance to the next web:
$$\min(1200,\ 1800,\ 1250)=1200\ \text{mm}\ \Rightarrow\
b_{\text{eff}}=500+2(1200)=2900\ \text{mm}$$
That width matters only in the sagging region, where the flange is in
compression.
Design the sagging steel as a tee. With 40 mm cover, 10M
stirrups and one layer of 30M bars, $d=1534$ mm. Assuming rectangular behaviour over
the full flange width,
$$A_s=3515\ \text{mm}^2\ \Rightarrow\
a=\frac{\phi_sA_sf_y}{\alpha_1\phi_cf'_cb_{\text{eff}}}=26\ \text{mm}\ <\ h_f=150\ \text{mm}$$
so the compression block lies entirely inside the flange and the assumption holds.
Provide 6–30M (4200 mm2), which fits in a single
layer in the 500 mm web with 41.9 mm clear spacing, giving
$$a=31.4\ \text{mm},\qquad M_r=\boxed{2168\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}}\ \ge\ 1818\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$$
with $c/d=0.023$: the tee is enormously under-reinforced in sagging, which is
typical when a wide slab acts as the compression flange.
Design the hogging steel as a rectangle. Over the support the
flange is in tension and only the 500 mm web resists compression:
$$A_s=5834\ \text{mm}^2\ \Rightarrow\ \text{provide}\
\textbf{9--30M}\ (6300\ \text{mm}^2)$$
$$a=\frac{0.85(6300)(400)}{0.805(0.65)(30)(500)}=272.9\ \text{mm},\qquad
M_r=\boxed{2993\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}}\ \ge\ 2792\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$$
with $c/d=0.199$, comfortably ductile. Clause 10.5.3.1 requires this tension steel to
be spread across the smaller of the effective flange width and a tenth of the span,
so distribute the nine bars over 1200 mm of slab at 150 mm centres — which is
also what keeps them in one layer and preserves $d=1534$ mm. The minimum,
$A_{s,\min}=2191$ mm2, is not close to governing at either
location.
Design the shear reinforcement. With
$d_v=\max(0.9d,0.72h)=1380$ mm and the simplified method,
$$V_c=0.65(0.18)\sqrt{30}(500)(1380)/10^3=442\ \text{kN},\qquad
V_s=963-442=521\ \text{kN}$$
$$s=\frac{\phi_sA_vf_yd_v\cot\theta}{V_s}
=\frac{0.85(400)(400)(1380)(1.428)}{521\times10^3}=515\ \text{mm}$$
Provide 15M closed stirrups at 400 mm within 4 m of support B. Away
from that zone the shear falls below the 889 kN that 15M at the 600 mm maximum
spacing carries, so 15M at 600 mm suffices over the rest of the
span, comfortably above $A_{v,\min}=246$ mm2. The web crushing limit
$0.25\phi_cf'_cb_wd_v=3363$ kN is nowhere approached.
Set the curtailment layout. The moment diagram crosses zero at
x = 9.0 m from A. Clause 12.12.3 requires the negative steel to run at least
$d$, $12d_b$ or $L_n/16$ — here 1534 mm — past that point, so carry the
9–30M top bars from B back to x = 7.4 m, and continue at least
a third of them (3–30M) to $x=6.5$ m as nominal top steel and hanger bars for
the stirrups. Of the 6–30M bottom bars, run four the full length into both
supports for the Clause 12.11.1 positive-moment anchorage, and stop the other two
where the four-bar resistance plus a development length
($l_d\approx1000$ mm for a 30M bottom bar in 30 MPa concrete) is still exceeded,
about 1.2 m from each support. Provide 10M skin reinforcement at 300 mm on each face
over the lower half of the 1600 mm web, as Clause 10.6.2 requires for deep
members.
Factored bending-moment diagram for member AB, showing the point of inflection at 9.0 m that sets the top-steel curtailment.
Final results
Quantity
Result
Section
500 mm web × 1600 mm deep tee; beff = 2900 mm
Support moment
MB = −2792 kN·m
Maximum sagging moment
1818 kN·m at 4 m from A
Shear at B
Vf = 963 kN
Bottom steel
6–30M, Mr = 2168 kN·m (a = 31 mm, inside the flange)
Top steel at B
9–30M over 1200 mm of slab, Mr = 2993 kN·m
Stirrups
15M at 400 mm within 4 m of B; 15M at 600 mm elsewhere