NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

16-Civ-B2 Advanced Structural Design · December 2016

Question 4 of 7: Composite steel-concrete floor system (14 + 6 marks)

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. 98-Civ-B2 Advanced Structural Design, December 2016, three hours, closed book (design handbooks and textbooks are permitted, no notes). Seven design questions; any five constitute a complete paper and all questions are of equal value (20 marks each). Because the whole paper is a study resource, all seven questions are solved here. Page 1 states that all loads shown on the figures are unfactored, and supplies the design data used throughout.

Reference texts.

Design data (page 1 of the examination paper)
QuantitySymbolValue
Concretef'c30 MPa
Structural steelFy350 MPa
Reinforcing barfy400 MPa
Prestressed concrete at transferfci35 MPa
Prestressed concretef'c50 MPa
Modular ration6
Strand tensile strengthfult1750 MPa
Strand yield strengthfy1450 MPa
Initial strand stressfinitial1200 MPa
Loss of prestressΔfp240 MPa
Effective strand stressfse = 1200 − 240960 MPa
Check — load factors. Page 1 says only that “all loads shown are unfactored”; it gives no dead/live split, so no NBCC combination can be formed exactly. Every solution below applies a single factor of 1.5 to the loads printed on the figures and 1.25 to self weight that the solver itself introduces (girder, slab, frame members), and states that assumption where it is used. The choice scales the required resistances but changes neither the collapse mechanisms, the section classifications, nor any interaction ratio, so the engineering conclusions are unaffected. Serviceability checks (prestress stresses, deflections, bearing pressure) use the unfactored loads as printed.

Question 4: Composite steel-concrete floor system (14 + 6 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. A 12 m by 22 m floor with a 160 mm deck slab on steel beams at 2.5 m centres, built unshored, carrying 8 kPa of live load with full interaction assumed between slab and beam.

Question data
QuantitySymbolValue
SpanL12 m
Floor width—22 m
Beam spacings2.5 m
Slab thicknessts160 mm
Slab dead loadwD0.160 × 24 × 2.5 = 9.60 kN/m
Live loadwL8 kPa × 2.5 = 20.0 kN/m
MaterialsFy / f'c350 / 30 MPa

Find. (a) The steel beam size, checked for the construction stage on the bare steel and for the final stage on the composite section; (b) the number of headed studs per beam.

effective width 2500 mm160 mm459 mm56 headed studs, 19 mm diameter, per beamunshored construction: steel alone carries the wet slab
Composite cross-section — 160 mm slab, 2500 mm effective width, W460×68 beam with 19 mm headed studs.

Approach. Unshored construction splits the design into two stages: the bare steel carries the wet slab, and the composite section carries the total factored load. Size on the composite ultimate moment, then confirm that the construction-stage strength and deflection are acceptable, and finally develop the full flange force with studs.

  1. Part (a) — establish the two load stages. Ignoring the steel self weight as instructed, $$w_f=1.25(9.60)+1.5(20.0)=42.0\ \text{kN/m}\ \Rightarrow\ M_f=\frac{42.0(12)^2}{8}=\boxed{756\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}},\quad V_f=252\ \text{kN}$$ and during construction the bare beam carries only the wet slab, $M_{f,\text{constr}}=1.25(9.6)(12)^2/8=216$ kN·m.
  2. Fix the effective slab width. Clause 17.4.1 limits the flange to the smaller of a quarter of the span and the beam spacing: $$b_{\text{eff}}=\min\left(\frac{12\,000}{4},\,2500\right)=\boxed{2500\ \text{mm}}$$ The slab compressive resistance is then $C_r=0.85\phi_cf'_cb_{\text{eff}}t_s=6630$ kN, far above anything the steel can deliver, so the plastic neutral axis will lie inside the slab.
  3. Select the beam on the composite resistance. Trying W460×68 (459 × 154, 15.4 mm flange, 9.1 mm web, $A=8640$ mm2), $$T_r=\phi A F_y=0.9(8640)(350)=2722\ \text{kN}\ <\ C_r,\qquad a=\frac{T_r}{0.85\phi_cf'_cb_{\text{eff}}}=65.7\ \text{mm}<160\ \text{mm}$$ so the whole steel section yields in tension and $$M_r=T_r\!\left(\frac{d}{2}+t_s-\frac{a}{2}\right) =2722\,(229.5+160-32.9)=\boxed{971\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}}\ \ge\ 756\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$$
  4. Check the construction stage. The bare beam has $Z=1.47\times10^6$ mm3, so $\phi M_p=463$ kN·m, comfortably above the 216 kN·m of wet concrete; the deck and its formwork brace the compression flange, consistent with the question's bracing note. Deflection is the real construction-stage control: $$\Delta_{D}=\frac{5w_DL^4}{384EI_x} =\frac{5(9.6)(12\,000)^4}{384(200\,000)(293\times10^6)}=\boxed{44.2\ \text{mm}} =\frac{L}{271}$$ This is why W460×68 is chosen rather than the lighter W460×60, which satisfies strength ($M_r=848$ kN·m) but deflects 51.6 mm, i.e. $L/232$, outside the customary $L/240$ limit for wet concrete. Camber the beams 40 mm.
  5. Check the in-service deflection and shear. With $n=E_s/E_c=8.11$ the transformed section has its neutral axis 122 mm below the slab top and $I_{tr}=1102\times10^6$ mm4, so the live-load deflection is $$\Delta_L=\frac{5(20.0)(12\,000)^4}{384(200\,000)(1102\times10^6)}=24.5\ \text{mm} =\frac{L}{490}\ \le\ \frac{L}{360}$$ The web at $h/w=47.1$ is stocky, so $F_s=0.66F_y$ and $V_r=\phi dwF_s=868$ kN against $V_f=252$ kN.
  6. Part (b) — size the shear connection. With full interaction the studs between the point of maximum moment and the support must develop the smaller of $C_r$ and $T_r$, i.e. $V_h=2722$ kN. For a 19 mm headed stud in normal-density 30 MPa concrete, $$q_r=0.5\phi_{sc}A_{sc}\sqrt{f'_cE_c} =0.5(0.80)(283.5)\sqrt{30(24\,648)}=97.5\ \text{kN}$$ which is below the cap $\phi_{sc}A_{sc}F_u=102$ kN, so $$n=\frac{2722}{97.5}=27.9\ \rightarrow\ \boxed{28\ \text{studs per half span},\ 56\ \text{per beam}}$$
  7. Detail the studs and the floor layout. Place the 56 studs in a single line at 200 mm centres over each 6 m half, which satisfies the 4d minimum longitudinal spacing and the 800 mm maximum. Studs 100 mm long give >4d embedment with 60 mm of cover in the 160 mm slab. Across the 22 m floor width, 2.5 m spacing does not divide evenly, so provide nine bays at 2.44 m (eight interior beams plus two edge beams); the reduced spacing keeps the tributary width below the 2.5 m used above, so the design remains conservative.
Final results
QuantityResult
Design loadswf = 42.0 kN/m; Mf = 756 kN·m, Vf = 252 kN
Effective slab widthbeff = 2500 mm
Steel sectionW460×68
Composite resistanceMr = 971 kN·m (a = 65.7 mm, PNA in slab)
Construction stageφMp = 463 ≥ 216 kN·m; Δ = 44.2 mm = L/271
Live-load deflection24.5 mm = L/490
Shear resistanceVr = 868 kN
Shear connectors56 studs of 19 mm per beam (28 per half span) at 200 mm
Floor layoutnine bays at 2.44 m over the 22 m width; camber 40 mm