NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

98-Comp-A1 · December 2017

Question 1 of 7: Two-Level Soft Limiter (Antiparallel Diode-Battery Branches)

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

98-Comp-A1, Electronics — National Exams, December 2017. Open-book, 3 hours; the paper's own NOTES/marking-scheme block states "FIVE (5) questions constitute a complete exam paper: the first 5 questions as they appear in the answer book will be marked," but all seven 20-mark questions are answered below as a complete study resource (per the standing "answer all M" rule). Unless stated otherwise, diode drops $V_D=0.7\text{V}$.

Reference texts: Sedra & Smith, Microelectronic Circuits (diode limiters, MOSFET common-gate amplifiers, active-RC matched-feedback filters and offset, BJT common-emitter amplifiers with current-source biasing, RC-ladder sinusoidal oscillators, CMOS static logic sizing, charge-redistribution SAR ADCs) — the single reference text covering every question on this paper.

Question 1: Two-Level Soft Limiter (Antiparallel Diode-Battery Branches) (20 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. $V_s(t)=10\sin(2\pi t)\text{V}$ (period $T=1\text{s}$); $R_s=10\text{k}\Omega$; $R_1=R_2=5\text{k}\Omega$; all diode drops $V_D=0.7\text{V}$; both branch batteries $3\text{V}$, wired with opposite polarity to each other so $D_1$ and $D_2$ conduct on opposite half-cycles.

Given data
QuantityValue
$V_s(t)$$10\sin(2\pi t)$ V
$R_s$$10\,\text{k}\Omega$
$R_1=R_2$$5\,\text{k}\Omega$
$V_D$ (all diodes)$0.7$ V
Branch batteries$3$ V each

Find. $V_o(V_s)$ while $D_1$ conducts; $V_s,V_o$ and $V_R$ waveforms with peaks; the resistor with the largest peak power and a suitable rating.

i.e. the two diodes are wired antiparallel, and the two 3V batteries likewise have opposite polarity in their branches. This is the only reading that gives the classic two-sided soft limiter the resistor values (comparable $R_1,R_2$ to $R_s$, not $R_1,R_2\ll R_s$) are clearly designed for, and it is used throughout.

Approach. With $D_1,D_2$ off, no current flows in $R_s$ and $V_o=V_s$ exactly. $D_2$ (anode at the input node) turns on once $V_s$ exceeds $+(V_D+3)=+3.7\text{V}$, and $D_1$ (cathode at the input node) turns on once $V_s$ drops below $-(V_D+3)=-3.7\text{V}$; because $R_1,R_2$ are comparable to $R_s$ (not negligible), each clamp is a soft ($V_s$-dependent slope, not flat) limit, found from KCL at the output node with the conducting branch in the loop.

  1. Part (a) — $V_o(V_s)$ with $D_1$ forward-biased. $D_1$ turns on for $V_s\le-3.7\text{V}$. With $D_1$ conducting (drop $V_D$) and its battery (net $3\text{V}$, oriented to add to the clamp) in series with $R_1$ to ground, KCL at the output node ($i$ from $V_s$ through $R_s$ equals $i$ down through $D_1$-battery-$R_1$) gives $$\frac{V_s-V_o}{R_s}=\frac{V_o+(V_D+3)}{R_1}\;\Longrightarrow\;\boxed{V_o=\frac{R_1V_s-R_s(V_D+3)}{R_s+R_1}}$$ Substituting numbers ($R_s=10\text{k}\Omega$, $R_1=5\text{k}\Omega$, $V_D+3=3.7\text{V}$): $$V_o=\frac{5000\,V_s-10000(3.7)}{15000}=\boxed{\frac{V_s}{3}-2.467\text{ V}}\qquad(V_s\le-3.7\text{V})$$ By the identical argument on $D_2$'s branch, the positive side is $V_o=\dfrac{V_s}{3}+2.467\text{V}$ for $V_s\ge+3.7\text{V}$; both meet the unity-slope middle region exactly at the $\pm3.7\text{V}$ breakpoints (continuity check: at $V_s=-3.7$, $V_o=-3.7/3-2.467=-3.7\text{V}$ ✓).
  2. Part (b) — $V_s,V_o$ vs. time. For $|V_s|\le3.7\text{V}$ (no diode conducts), $V_o=V_s$ exactly. Beyond that, $V_o$ follows the soft-limited $\tfrac13$-slope lines from Part (a). At the sine's peaks $V_s=\pm10\text{V}$: $$V_{o,\text{pos,pk}}=\frac{10}{3}+2.467=\boxed{+5.8\text{ V}},\qquad V_{o,\text{neg,pk}}=-\frac{10}{3}-2.467=\boxed{-5.8\text{ V}}$$ So $V_o$ is a sine that tracks $V_s$ 1:1 through $\pm3.7\text{V}$ and then bends onto a shallow $1/3$-slope line up to $\pm5.8\text{V}$ at the peaks — a soft, symmetric limiter (Fig. Q1(b)).
  3. Part (c) — $V_R$ vs. time. $V_R=V_s-V_o$ (the resistor's own $+/-$ reference in Figure 1), zero throughout the linear region and rising only once a diode conducts: $$V_{R,\text{pos,pk}}=10-5.8=\boxed{+4.2\text{ V}},\qquad V_{R,\text{neg,pk}}=-10-(-5.8)=\boxed{-4.2\text{ V}}$$ (Fig. Q1(c) — $V_R$ is flat at zero for roughly the middle third of each half-cycle, then bulges symmetrically to $\pm4.2\text{V}$ at the peaks.)
  4. Part (d) — largest peak power, rating. The peak branch current is $I_{\text{pk}}=V_{R,\text{pk}}/R_s=4.2/10\text{k}=0.42\text{mA}$, and by KCL this same current flows through whichever of $R_1$/$R_2$ is conducting at that instant (series path). Peak dissipation in each: $$P_{R_s,\text{pk}}=I_{\text{pk}}^2R_s=(0.42\text{mA})^2(10\text{k}\Omega)=\boxed{1.764\text{ mW}}$$ $$P_{R_1,\text{pk}}=P_{R_2,\text{pk}}=I_{\text{pk}}^2R_1=(0.42\text{mA})^2(5\text{k}\Omega)=\boxed{0.882\text{ mW}}$$ Since the same current flows through both series elements, the larger resistor dissipates more — $R_s$ (double $R_1$'s or $R_2$'s value) has the largest peak power. Even $1.764\text{mW}$ is far below any standard resistor's rating, so a standard $\boxed{1/8\text{ W (}125\text{ mW)}}$ resistor already gives >70$\times$ margin; a $1/4\text{W}$ part is an equally safe, more commonly stocked choice.
v (V) t (s) 5.8 3.7 -3.7 -5.8 Vs (dashed, unclamped) Vo (solid, soft-limited)
Fig. Q1(b) — $V_s$ (dashed) vs. $V_o$ (solid): unity slope for $|V_s|\le3.7\text{V}$, then a shallow $1/3$-slope bend to $\pm5.8\text{V}$ peaks.
v⃗R (V) t (s) 4.2 -4.2
Fig. Q1(c) — $V_R=V_s-V_o$: flat at zero through the linear region, bulging to $\pm4.2\text{V}$ only while a diode branch conducts.
Final Results — Question 1
QuantityValue
$V_o(V_s)$, $D_1$ on ($V_s\le-3.7\text{V}$)$V_s/3-2.467$ V
Breakpoints$\pm3.7$ V
$V_{o,\text{pk}}$$\pm5.8$ V
$V_{R,\text{pk}}$$\pm4.2$ V
Peak branch current$0.42$ mA
$P_{R_s,\text{pk}}$ (largest)$1.764$ mW
$P_{R_1,\text{pk}}=P_{R_2,\text{pk}}$$0.882$ mW
Recommended rating$1/8$ W (or $1/4$ W)
← Paper overview