Question 6 of 7: Sequence networks and a double line-to-ground fault
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams, May 2015 — 07-Elec-B7 Power Systems
Engineering. Open-book, three hours, seven problems of equal value; any five constitute a
complete paper. Every problem is answered here, because the set is intended as a study
resource rather than an exam script.
Reference texts for this subject.
M. E. El-Hawary, Electrical Power Systems: Design and Analysis, rev. ed.,
IEEE Press / Wiley — the syllabus text for 07-Elec-B7. Chapters 4 (transmission lines),
5 (synchronous machines), 3 (transformers), 6 (load flow), 7 (fault analysis) and
8 (system stability) map one-to-one onto the seven problems below.
J. D. Glover, T. J. Overbye and M. S. Sarma, Power System Analysis and Design,
6th ed., Cengage — parallel treatment of the ABCD long-line model, symmetrical
components and the equal-area criterion.
S. J. Chapman, Electric Machinery Fundamentals, 5th ed., McGraw-Hill —
salient-pole two-reaction theory and transformer loss/frequency behaviour.
CSA C22.3 No. 1, Overhead Systems, and CAN/CSA C22.2 standards give the
Canadian equipment and clearance framework these calculations feed into.
Question 6: Sequence networks and a double line-to-ground fault
Given. The machine, transformer and line data listed in the question, with
a 25 MVA, 11 kV base chosen on the generator side. Reading the connections off Figure (3-a):
transformer T2 is delta on the generator side and grounded-wye on the line side;
transformer T1 is grounded-wye on the line side and delta on the motor side; the
generator and motor 2 are wye-connected and grounded through 2.5 Ω reactors; motor 1 is
wye-connected and ungrounded. The fault point f is on the line side of T1; point g
is on its delta (motor) side.
Find. Confirmation of every per-unit reactance printed on the sequence
networks of Figures (3-b) and (3-c), then the phase currents flowing at point g when a double
line-to-ground fault occurs at point f.
Approach. Convert every impedance to the common base, checking each against
the printed figure. Then reduce the positive-, negative- and zero-sequence networks to their
Thevenin values at f, connect them in the double line-to-ground configuration, and finally
divide the sequence currents between the generator branch and the motor branch —
remembering that the delta winding of T1 blocks zero-sequence current from ever
reaching g.
Part (a) — verification of the sequence networks
Establish the three voltage bases. The generator-side base is 11 kV, so
the line-side base follows the transformer ratio,
$$\begin{aligned} V_{b,\text{line}} &= 11\left(\frac{121}{10.8}\right)=123.24\ \text{kV} \\ V_{b,\text{motor}} &= 123.24\left(\frac{10.8}{121}\right)=11.0\ \text{kV} \end{aligned}$$
and the impedance bases are $Z_b = V_b^{2}/S_b$, that is 4.840 Ω on the machine sides and
607.53 Ω on the line side.
Convert the rotating machines. The generator is already on base, so
$X_g'' = 0.20$ pu. The motors are converted by
$X_{\text{new}} = X_{\text{old}}\left(S_{\text{new}}/S_{\text{old}}\right)\left(V_{\text{old}}/V_{\text{new}}\right)^{2}$:
$$\begin{aligned} X_{m1} &= 0.25\left(\frac{25}{15}\right)\left(\frac{10}{11}\right)^{2}=0.3444\ \text{pu} \\ X_{m2} &= 0.25\left(\frac{25}{7.5}\right)\left(\frac{10}{11}\right)^{2}=0.6887\ \text{pu} \end{aligned}$$
matching the j0.345 and j0.69 printed on Figure (3-b).
Convert the transformers and the line. Both transformers give
$$X_T=0.10\left(\frac{25}{30}\right)\left(\frac{10.8}{11}\right)^{2}=0.08033\ \text{pu}$$
against the j0.0805 printed, and the line gives
$X_{\text{line}} = 100/607.53 = 0.16460$ pu against j0.164 printed. Both agree to the third
decimal, the small residual being the exam's own rounding.
Convert the zero-sequence quantities. The line contributes
$X_{0,\text{line}} = 300/607.53 = 0.4938$ pu (printed j0.494). The motors' zero-sequence
reactances, referred from their own ratings, are
$0.06(25/15)(10/11)^{2} = 0.0826$ pu (printed j0.082) and
$0.06(25/7.5)(10/11)^{2} = 0.1653$ pu (printed j0.164). Each neutral reactor enters the
zero-sequence network as three times its ohmic value,
$$3X_n = \frac{3(2.5)}{4.840}=1.550\ \text{pu}$$
which is the j1.548 printed against the generator and motor 2. Every value on Figures (3-b)
and (3-c) is therefore confirmed.
Confirm the zero-sequence topology, which is where the marks really are.
A delta winding provides a circulating path for zero-sequence current but no path out of it,
so it appears as an open circuit on the line side of the transformer arm. T2 carries
its delta on the generator side, so the generator branch $j(1.548+0.06)$ terminates at node d
and never connects to the line; T1 carries its delta on the motor side, so the motor
branches terminate at g and are likewise isolated. The only paths from the reference bus to
the line are the two grounded-wye transformer neutrals. The tabulated generator and motor
zero-sequence reactances are therefore decoys for this fault — they are drawn on
Figure (3-c) but carry no current.
Figure 6 — Zero-sequence network reduced to
the fault point f. Both delta windings open-circuit the machine branches, leaving only the two
transformer arms.
Part (b) — the double line-to-ground fault at f
Reduce the positive-sequence network to f. The generator reaches f through
its own reactance, T2 and the line; the two motors are in parallel and reach f
through T1:
$$X_{\text{gen path}}=0.20+0.0805+0.164=0.4445\ \text{pu}$$
$$X_{\text{motor path}}=\frac{(0.345)(0.69)}{0.345+0.69}+0.0805=0.230+0.0805=0.3105\ \text{pu}$$
$$X_1=\frac{(0.4445)(0.3105)}{0.4445+0.3105}=0.18280\ \text{pu}$$
The negative-sequence network is identical in topology and value, so $X_2 = 0.18280$ pu.
Reduce the zero-sequence network to f. From f there are exactly two paths
to the reference bus: straight through the T1 arm, or along the line and through the
T2 arm.
$$X_0=\frac{(0.0805)(0.494+0.0805)}{0.0805+0.494+0.0805}=\frac{(0.0805)(0.5745)}{0.655}$$
$$\boxed{X_0 = 0.07061\ \text{pu}}$$
Because $X_0$ is well below $X_1$, this fault location will produce ground-fault currents that
exceed the three-phase value — the usual signature of a solidly earthed transformer
close to the fault.
Connect the networks for a double line-to-ground fault. For a fault on
phases b and c to ground, the positive network drives the parallel combination of the negative
and zero networks:
$$I_{a1}=\frac{E}{j\left[X_1+\dfrac{X_2X_0}{X_2+X_0}\right]}
=\frac{1.0}{j\left[0.18280+0.05093\right]}=\frac{1.0}{j0.23374}$$
$$I_{a1}=4.2783\angle-90^\circ\ \text{pu}$$
Find the sequence voltage and the other two sequence currents. All three
sequence voltages are equal at the fault point:
$$V_{a1}=V_{a2}=V_{a0}=E-jX_1I_{a1}=1.0-(j0.18280)(4.2783\angle-90^\circ)=0.21791\ \text{pu}$$
$$\begin{aligned} I_{a2} &= -\frac{V_{a2}}{jX_2}=1.1920\angle 90^\circ\ \text{pu} \\ I_{a0} &= -\frac{V_{a0}}{jX_0}=3.0863\angle 90^\circ\ \text{pu} \end{aligned}$$
and $I_{a1}+I_{a2}+I_{a0}=0$, confirming that the healthy phase a carries no current, which is
the defining condition of this fault.
Divide the positive- and negative-sequence currents at the fault. Each
network splits its current between the generator path and the motor path in inverse proportion
to their reactances. The motor share is
$$k_m=\frac{0.4445}{0.4445+0.3105}=0.58874$$
so the currents arriving at f from the motor side are
$$\begin{aligned} I_{a1}^{(g)} &= 0.58874(4.2783\angle-90^\circ)=2.5188\angle-90^\circ\ \text{pu} \\ I_{a2}^{(g)} &= 0.58874(1.1920\angle 90^\circ)=0.7018\angle 90^\circ\ \text{pu} \end{aligned}$$
Apply the delta blocking to the zero sequence. Point g lies on the delta
winding of T1. Zero-sequence current circulates inside that delta but cannot leave
it, so
$$I_{a0}^{(g)}=0$$
This single fact is what makes the currents at g quite different in character from those at f,
and it is the reason the whole of the generator and motor zero-sequence data plays no part in
the answer.
Transform to phase currents at g. With $a = 1\angle120^\circ$ and only two
sequence components present,
$$I_a=I_{a1}^{(g)}+I_{a2}^{(g)}=1.8170\angle-90^\circ\ \text{pu}$$
$$I_b=a^{2}I_{a1}^{(g)}+aI_{a2}^{(g)}=2.9334\angle 161.96^\circ\ \text{pu}$$
$$I_c=aI_{a1}^{(g)}+a^{2}I_{a2}^{(g)}=2.9334\angle 18.04^\circ\ \text{pu}$$
The three sum to zero, as they must in a delta-side winding, and phase a is no longer
current-free: on the delta side the healthy phase carries 1.817 pu.
Convert to amperes. The base current at g, on the 11 kV motor-side base,
is
$$I_b^{\text{base}}=\frac{25\times10^{6}}{\sqrt3\,(11\,000)}=1312.2\ \text{A}$$
so
$$\boxed{\begin{aligned} |I_b| = |I_c| &= 2.9334\ \text{pu} = 3849\ \text{A} \\ |I_a| &= 1.8170\ \text{pu} = 2384\ \text{A} \end{aligned}}$$
For comparison, at the fault point itself the base current is 117.1 A and the faulted phases
carry $6.6238$ pu $= 776$ A each, with $3I_{a0} = 9.2588$ pu $= 1084$ A returning through
ground.
Figure 7 — Sequence-network interconnection
for the double line-to-ground fault, with the reduced Thevenin reactances at f.
Check: Part (b) is solved with the reactances printed on Figures (3-b) and
(3-c), as Part (a) directs. Using instead the exact converted values (0.080331, 0.164601,
0.344353, 0.688705, 0.493802) changes the answers by less than 0.2 per cent and none of the
conclusions. Pre-fault load current is neglected, so all three sources are taken as
1.0∡0° pu behind their subtransient reactances — the standard assumption for a
subtransient fault study. The transformer phase shift across a delta-wye bank rotates the
positive- and negative-sequence currents by ±30° in opposite directions; it does not
change any magnitude quoted here, so it has been left out, as Figure (3-b) itself does.
Question 6 — final results
Quantity
Result
Positive- and negative-sequence Thevenin reactance at f