Question 6 of 7: Reinforced-concrete continuous girder, limit states design
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams, December 2015 — 07-Str-A5 Advanced
Structural Design. Three hours, "closed book" (textbooks and design handbooks permitted, no
notes). Seven questions; any five constitute a complete paper and all are of equal value, the
printed mark split being 20 marks each. All loads shown on Figures 1–4 are unfactored.
All seven questions are answered here.
Design data printed on page 1 and used throughout.
Concrete \(f'_c = 30\ \text{MPa}\); structural steel \(F_y = 350\ \text{MPa}\);
reinforcing steel \(f_y = 400\ \text{MPa}\); prestressed concrete \(f'_{ci} = 35\ \text{MPa}\)
at transfer and \(f'_c = 50\ \text{MPa}\) in service, \(n = 6\);
\(f_{pu} = 1750\ \text{MPa}\), \(f_{py} = 1450\ \text{MPa}\),
\(f_{p,\text{initial}} = 1200\ \text{MPa}\), losses \(= 240\ \text{MPa}\), hence
\(f_{pe} = 960\ \text{MPa}\) and the loss ratio \(\eta = 0.80\).
Check: load factors and figure data. The paper states only that "all loads
shown are unfactored" and gives no load classification, so every printed load is treated as a
specified live load and factored at 1.5, while member and element self weight is
treated as dead and factored at 1.25 (NBCC 2020 Case 2, \(1.25D + 1.5L\)). Resistance factors
are \(\phi = 0.90\) (steel), \(\phi_w = 0.67\) with the additional 0.67 of CSA S16
Cl. 13.13.2.2 (welds), \(\phi_{sc} = 0.80\) (shear studs), \(\phi_c = 0.65\),
\(\phi_s = 0.85\), \(\phi_p = 0.90\) (CSA A23.3). Figure 2 has a free tip at A, a roller at B and a pin at C; Figure 4 has a
hatched fixed base at A and a hatched fixed end at C, with the 200 kN arrow pointing
towards the frame at mid-height of the column.
Reference texts for 07-Str-A5.
CSA S16:19, Design of Steel Structures, with the CISC Handbook of Steel
Construction (11th ed.) — Cl. 13.3 (compression), 13.4 (shear), 13.5–13.6
(flexure and lateral–torsional buckling), 13.8 (beam–columns), 13.13 (welds),
14.3–14.6 (plate girders), Cl. 17 (composite beams).
Given. The girder of Figure 1 again — fixed at A and C, simply supported
at B, two 8 m spans, a 500 kN specified load at the centre of each — now to be built in
reinforced concrete with \(f'_c = 30\ \text{MPa}\) and \(f_y = 400\ \text{MPa}\).
Find. The flexural reinforcement at the supports and at mid-span, the shear
reinforcement, and a drawn layout.
Approach. Analyse elastically (limit states design of reinforced concrete
uses an elastic distribution of actions, unlike Question 4), design the tension steel from the
rectangular stress block at the two critical sections, then design stirrups by the CSA A23.3
simplified method at \(d\) from the support face.
Actions. A \(450 \times 1000\) section weighs 10.8 kN/m. Symmetry again makes
each span fixed-ended, so with \(P_f = 750\ \text{kN}\) and \(w_f = 13.5\ \text{kN/m}\)
$$M_f^{\text{sup}} = \frac{P_fL}{8} + \frac{w_fL^2}{12} = 750 + 72 = \boxed{822\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}}$$
$$M_f^{\text{mid}} = 750 + 36 = 786\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}, \qquad V_f = 375 + 54 = 429\ \text{kN}$$
The same hogging moment applies at A, at C and over the interior support B.
Flexural steel at the supports. Solving
\(M_r = \phi_sA_sf_y\left(d - a/2\right)\) with
\(a = \phi_sA_sf_y/(\alpha_1\phi_cf'_cb)\) for \(M_r = 822\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}\) gives
\(A_s = 2803\ \text{mm}^2\). Provide \(\boxed{5-30\text{M}}\) (3500 mm²) in the top face,
which develops
$$a = \frac{0.85(3500)(400)}{0.805(0.65)(30)(450)} = 168.5\ \text{mm}, \qquad
M_r = 1190\times10^3(930 - 84.2) = 1006\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$$
Four bars would give only 821 kN·m, marginally short of the 822 kN·m demand, so
the fifth bar is needed. Ductility is ample: \(c/d = 0.202\), far below the
\(700/(700+f_y) = 0.636\) balanced limit.
Flexural steel at mid-span. For \(M_f = 786\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}\),
\(A_s = 2670\ \text{mm}^2\); provide \(\boxed{4-30\text{M}}\) (2800 mm²) in the bottom face,
\(M_r = 821\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}\). Both exceed the minimum
\(A_{s,\min} = 0.2\sqrt{f'_c}\,b_th/f_y = 1232\ \text{mm}^2\).
Shear demand and concrete contribution. Take
\(d_v = \max(0.9d,\ 0.72h) = 837\ \text{mm}\). At \(d\) from the support the demand falls only by
the distributed load, since the point load sits at mid-span:
$$V_f = 429 - 13.5(0.93) = \boxed{416\ \text{kN}}$$
With at least minimum stirrups, the simplified method takes \(\beta = 0.18\) and
\(\theta = 35^\circ\), so
$$V_c = \phi_c\lambda\beta\sqrt{f'_c}\,b_wd_v = 0.65(0.18)(5.477)(450)(837) \times 10^{-3}
= 241.4\ \text{kN}$$
Stirrups. The steel must supply the remaining 175 kN. Using 10M closed
double-leg stirrups (\(A_v = 200\ \text{mm}^2\)) at \(s = 250\ \text{mm}\),
$$V_s = \frac{\phi_sA_vf_yd_v\cot\theta}{s} = \frac{0.85(200)(400)(837)(1.428)}{250} \times 10^{-3}
= 325\ \text{kN}$$
$$V_r = V_c + V_s = \boxed{566\ \text{kN}} \;>\; 416\ \text{kN}$$
The spacing satisfies \(s \le \min(0.7d_v, 600) = 586\ \text{mm}\), and the section is far below
the crushing limit \(0.25\phi_cf'_cb_wd_v = 1836\ \text{kN}\). Because the shear beside the
central point load is almost as large (375 kN), carry the same 250 mm spacing right through the
spans rather than opening it out in the middle.
Layout. Run the 4–30M bottom bars continuously from A to C and anchor
them into the end walls. Place 5–30M top bars over each of A, B and C, extending them into
the spans past the point of contraflexure (about 2.6 m each side of a support here) plus the
development length; two of the five continue the full length as stirrup hangers. All stirrups are
10M closed at 250 mm, with the first at 125 mm from each support face.
Reinforcement layout for the continuous girder, with the section at an interior support.