Question 7 of 7: Reinforced-concrete rigid frame — beam–column AB and its deflection
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams, December 2015 — 07-Str-A5 Advanced
Structural Design. Three hours, "closed book" (textbooks and design handbooks permitted, no
notes). Seven questions; any five constitute a complete paper and all are of equal value, the
printed mark split being 20 marks each. All loads shown on Figures 1–4 are unfactored.
All seven questions are answered here.
Design data printed on page 1 and used throughout.
Concrete \(f'_c = 30\ \text{MPa}\); structural steel \(F_y = 350\ \text{MPa}\);
reinforcing steel \(f_y = 400\ \text{MPa}\); prestressed concrete \(f'_{ci} = 35\ \text{MPa}\)
at transfer and \(f'_c = 50\ \text{MPa}\) in service, \(n = 6\);
\(f_{pu} = 1750\ \text{MPa}\), \(f_{py} = 1450\ \text{MPa}\),
\(f_{p,\text{initial}} = 1200\ \text{MPa}\), losses \(= 240\ \text{MPa}\), hence
\(f_{pe} = 960\ \text{MPa}\) and the loss ratio \(\eta = 0.80\).
Check: load factors and figure data. The paper states only that "all loads
shown are unfactored" and gives no load classification, so every printed load is treated as a
specified live load and factored at 1.5, while member and element self weight is
treated as dead and factored at 1.25 (NBCC 2020 Case 2, \(1.25D + 1.5L\)). Resistance factors
are \(\phi = 0.90\) (steel), \(\phi_w = 0.67\) with the additional 0.67 of CSA S16
Cl. 13.13.2.2 (welds), \(\phi_{sc} = 0.80\) (shear studs), \(\phi_c = 0.65\),
\(\phi_s = 0.85\), \(\phi_p = 0.90\) (CSA A23.3). Figure 2 has a free tip at A, a roller at B and a pin at C; Figure 4 has a
hatched fixed base at A and a hatched fixed end at C, with the 200 kN arrow pointing
towards the frame at mid-height of the column.
Reference texts for 07-Str-A5.
CSA S16:19, Design of Steel Structures, with the CISC Handbook of Steel
Construction (11th ed.) — Cl. 13.3 (compression), 13.4 (shear), 13.5–13.6
(flexure and lateral–torsional buckling), 13.8 (beam–columns), 13.13 (welds),
14.3–14.6 (plate girders), Cl. 17 (composite beams).
Given. The frame of Figure 4 built in reinforced concrete:
\(f'_c = 30\ \text{MPa}\), \(f_y = 400\ \text{MPa}\),
\(E_c = 4500\sqrt{30} = 24\,648\ \text{MPa}\). Take a beam BC of \(400 \times 900\) mm and a
column AB of \(500 \times 700\) mm, the 700 mm dimension lying in the plane of the frame.
Given data
Quantity
Value
Column AB / beam BC
500 × 700 mm, 10 m / 400 × 900 mm, 9 m
Loads (specified)
200 kN horizontal at 5 m; 600 kN at B; 450 kN at 3 m and 6 m
Find. (a) the longitudinal reinforcement and ties for AB, including
slenderness; (b) the long-term horizontal deflection at mid-height of AB.
Approach. The frame has only one degree of kinematic freedom — the
rotation of joint B — because C is fixed and the members are axially rigid, so a
single slope-deflection equation gives all four end moments; design the column from strain
compatibility with the moment magnified for slenderness, then integrate the column curvature to
get its mid-height deflection and multiply for cracking and creep.
Fixed-end moments (factored). With \(H_f = 300\ \text{kN}\) and the two beam
loads at 675 kN,
$$\text{FEM}_{AB} = -\frac{H_fL}{8} = -375, \quad \text{FEM}_{BA} = +375\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$$
$$\text{FEM}_{BC} = -\sum\frac{Pab^2}{L^2} = -(900 + 450) = -1350, \quad \text{FEM}_{CB} = +1350\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$$
Solve the single joint rotation. Moment equilibrium at B,
\(M_{BA} + M_{BC} = 0\), gives
$$\theta_B\left(\frac{4E_cI_c}{10} + \frac{4E_cI_b}{9}\right) = 1350 - 375 = 975\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}
\;\Rightarrow\; \theta_B = 2.395 \times 10^{-6}\ \text{rad}$$
Back-substituting,
$$M_B = \boxed{712.5\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}}, \quad M_A = -206.3, \quad
M_{\text{mid}} = +290.6, \quad M_C = 1668.8\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$$
Note that the column bends in double curvature, its moment changing sign at about 2 m above the
base.
Axial load on the column. The beam shear at B is
\(675 - (M_C - M_B)/9 = 568.7\ \text{kN}\), so with the 900 kN at the joint and the column's own
factored weight (105 kN),
$$C_f = 900 + 568.7 + 105 = \boxed{1574\ \text{kN}}$$
(a) Slenderness. Taking \(k = 0.7\) for a braced column fixed at the base and
restrained by a stiff beam at the top, \(kl_u/r = 0.7(10\,000)/(0.3 \times 700) = 33.3\), against
the limit \(34 - 12(M_1/M_2) = 30.5\). Slenderness must therefore be considered. With
\(EI = 0.4E_cI_g/(1 + \beta_d)\) and \(\beta_d = 0.07\),
\(P_c = \pi^2EI/(kl_u)^2 = 26\,524\ \text{kN}\), and with \(C_m = 1.0\) because a transverse load
acts between the ends,
$$\delta_b = \frac{1}{1 - C_f/(\phi_mP_c)} = 1.086 \;\Rightarrow\;
M_c = 1.086(712.5) = \boxed{774\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}}$$
(a) Reinforcement from strain compatibility. Try 4–30M in each of the
two 500 mm faces (\(A_s = A_s' = 2800\ \text{mm}^2\)). Axial equilibrium
\(C_c + C_s - T = C_f\) with both bar layers yielding gives
$$C_c = 1618\ \text{kN} \;\Rightarrow\; a = \frac{C_c}{\alpha_1\phi_cf'_cb} = 206.1\ \text{mm},
\qquad c = \frac{a}{\beta_1} = 230.3\ \text{mm}$$
Both strains confirm yielding (\(\varepsilon_s' = 0.00247\),
\(\varepsilon_t = 0.00611\), against \(\varepsilon_y = 0.0020\)). Moments about the section
centroid then give
$$M_r = C_c\left(\frac{h}{2} - \frac{a}{2}\right) + C_s\left(\frac{h}{2} - d'\right)
+ T\left(d - \frac{h}{2}\right) = \boxed{925\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}} \;>\; 774\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}$$
Add two mid-side bars for detailing, giving 10–30M in all
(\(\rho = 0.020\), above the 0.01 minimum), with 10M ties at 400 mm
(\(\le 16d_b = 478\) mm).
(b) Immediate horizontal deflection. Repeat the analysis at specified loads:
\(\theta_B = 1.597 \times 10^{-6}\), \(M_A = -137.5\), \(M_B = 475.0\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}\),
base shear \(V_A = 66.25\ \text{kN}\). The column base is fixed, so integrating the curvature
from A upwards,
$$\Delta_5 = \int_0^{5}\frac{(5-x)\,M(x)}{E_cI_g}\,dx
= \frac{1}{E_cI_g}\left[-137.5(12.5) + 66.25(20.83)\right] = \boxed{0.96\ \text{mm}}$$
This is far less than the 2.96 mm a fixed-ended column would give under the same 200 kN, because
the beam's large hogging moment at B bends the column back against the sway.
(b) Cracking and creep. The column cracks at both ends, so take
\(I_e \approx 0.7I_g\) (A23.3 Cl. 10.14.1.2), raising the immediate value to 1.37 mm. For the
sustained part of the load, the long-term multiplier is
$$s = \frac{\zeta}{1 + 50\rho'} = \frac{2.0}{1 + 50(0.00886)} = 1.386$$
so, treating the whole loading as sustained,
$$\Delta_{\text{long-term}} = 1.37(1 + 1.386) = \boxed{3.3\ \text{mm}}$$
which is only \(h/3000\), comfortably inside the usual \(h/500 = 20\ \text{mm}\) drift limit. A
column this deep in a frame restrained at both ends is governed by strength, not by
deflection.