NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

16-Civ-B2 Advanced Structural Design · December 2017

Question 2 of 7: Beam-column check of member ABC and the footing at A

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. National Exams, December 2017, 16-Civ-B2 Advanced Structural Design — 3 hours, open book (design handbooks and textbooks permitted). Seven design questions of equal value; any five constitute a complete paper. All seven are solved here because the set is a study resource. Page 1 supplies the design data used throughout: concrete $f'_c = 30$ MPa; structural steel $F_y = 350$ MPa; rebar $f_y = 400$ MPa; prestressed concrete $f_{ci} = 35$ MPa at transfer, $f'_c = 50$ MPa, $n = 6$, $f_{ult} = 1750$ MPa, $f_{py} = 1450$ MPa, $f_{initial} = 1200$ MPa, losses $= 240$ MPa. Page 1 also states that all loads shown are unfactored.

Reference texts. CSA S16:19 Design of Steel Structures (Cl 8.5, 13.4, 13.6, 13.8, 14.3–14.6, 17); CISC Handbook of Steel Construction, 11th ed.; CSA A23.3:19 Design of Concrete Structures (Cl 9.8, 10, 11, 15, 18); CSA S6:19 Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code; Kulak & Grondin, Limit States Design in Structural Steel, 10th ed.; MacGregor & Bartlett, Reinforced Concrete: Mechanics and Design (Canadian ed.); Collins & Mitchell, Prestressed Concrete Structures.

Check: load factors. The paper states only that the loads are unfactored and gives no dead/live split. Throughout, the printed loads are taken as one variable-load case and factored by $1.5$, while self weight that the solver introduces (concrete frames, the prestressed girder, the bridge deck) is factored by $1.25$, per NBCC 2020 Table 4.1.3.2. The mechanisms, section classifications and interaction equations are unaffected by that choice; only the magnitudes scale.

Question 2: Beam-column check of member ABC and the footing at A (14 + 6 marks)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Given. Member A–B–C is the windward column of Figure 1, W610×217 from Question 1, 8 m long with lateral support at A, B (the 80 kN load point) and C. From the collapse state of Question 1 it carries $C_f = 932.1$ kN with $M_A = 0$ (pinned base), $M_B = 314.1$ kN·m and $M_C = 862.5$ kN·m. The allowable soil bearing pressure is 500 kPa.

QuantitySymbolValue
Section—W610×217 ($A = 27\,619$ mm$^2$)
Strong / weak axis radius of gyration$r_x$ / $r_y$262.0 / 76.9 mm
Factored axial compression$C_f$932.1 kN
Factored moment at C$M_f$862.5 kN·m
In-plane unbraced length$KL_x$8000 mm
Out-of-plane segments$L_{AB}$ / $L_{BC}$5000 / 3000 mm
Allowable bearing pressure$q_{all}$500 kPa

Find. (a) the three Cl 13.8.2 interaction ratios for member ABC and a verdict; (b) plan size, thickness and reinforcement for a spread footing at A.

A B C H Cf = 932.1 kN 862.5 314.1 0 Member ABC: axial force and bending moment (kN.m)
Member ABC: axial force and the bending-moment diagram from the collapse state. The base is pinned, so the moment grows linearly to 314 kN.m at B and 862.5 kN.m at C.

Approach. Run Cl 13.8.2 in its three parts — cross-sectional strength, overall member strength and lateral-torsional buckling strength — taking each out-of-plane segment separately with its own $\omega_2$, then size the footing on the service axial load and check punching shear, one-way shear and minimum steel.

  1. Part (a) — axial resistances. With $n = 1.34$ and $\lambda = \frac{KL}{r}\sqrt{F_y/\pi^2E}$, $$\begin{gathered}\frac{KL}{r_x} = \frac{8000}{262.0} = 30.5 \;\Rightarrow\; C_{rx} = 8160\ \text{kN}, \\ \frac{KL}{r_y} = \frac{5000}{76.9} = 65.1 \;\Rightarrow\; C_{ry} = 5905\ \text{kN},\end{gathered}$$ and over the 3 m segment $C_{ry} = 7723$ kN. The squash load is $C_y = A F_y = 9667$ kN.
  2. Moment amplification. The moment ratio over the critical segment B–C is $\kappa = 314.1/(-862.5) = -0.364$ (single curvature), so $\omega_1 = 0.6 - 0.4\kappa = 0.746$. With $C_e = \pi^2 E I_x/(KL)^2 = 58\,488$ kN, $$U_1 = \frac{\omega_1}{1 - C_f/C_e} = \frac{0.746}{1 - 0.0159} = 0.758 \;\Rightarrow\; U_1 = 1.0$$ because Cl 13.8.4 does not permit $U_1 \lt 1.0$ for a member in an unbraced frame.
  3. Check (a): cross-sectional strength. $$\frac{C_f}{\phi C_y} + \frac{0.85 U_1 M_f}{\phi M_p} = \frac{932.1}{8700} + \frac{0.85(862.5)}{2144} = 0.107 + 0.342 = 0.449 .$$
  4. Check (b): overall member strength. Replace $\phi C_y$ with the in-plane $C_{rx}$: $$\frac{932.1}{8160} + 0.342 = 0.456 .$$
  5. Check (c): lateral-torsional buckling strength, segment by segment. Segment A–B ($L = 5$ m, moment $0 \to 314.1$, $\omega_2 = 1.75$) and segment B–C ($L = 3$ m, $\kappa = -0.364$, $\omega_2 = 1.75 + 1.05\kappa + 0.3\kappa^2 = 1.407$) both return $M_u \gg 0.67M_p$, so $M_r = \phi M_p = 2144$ kN·m in each. Then $$\begin{gathered}\text{A--B:}\ \frac{932.1}{5905} + \frac{0.85(314.1)}{2144} = 0.282, \\ \text{B--C:}\ \frac{932.1}{7723} + \frac{0.85(862.5)}{2144} = 0.463 .\end{gathered}$$
  6. Verdict on part (a). The governing ratio is $$\boxed{0.46 \;\lt\; 1.0}$$ so member ABC is adequate as a beam-column, with about 54 per cent reserve. The reserve is not waste: the section was sized in Question 1 by the leeward column, which hosts the plastic hinge and carries 9 per cent more axial load, and detailing both columns alike is the practical choice. Had the windward column been sized on its own demand a W610×155 would have sufficed.
  7. Part (b) — service loads at A. The base is pinned, so the footing sees axial load and shear but no moment. Dividing out the load factor, $$N = \frac{932.1}{1.5} = 621.4\ \text{kN},\qquad V = \frac{62.8}{1.5} = 41.9\ \text{kN}.$$
  8. Plan size on the allowable bearing pressure. Try a 1.2 m square pad 450 mm thick; its own weight is $1.2^2(0.45)(24) = 15.6$ kN, so $$q = \frac{621.4 + 15.6}{1.2^2} = 442\ \text{kPa} \;\le\; 500\ \text{kPa} \quad\checkmark$$ at 88 per cent of the allowable value. The factored net pressure used for the structural checks is $q_f = 932.1/1.44 = 647$ kPa.
  9. Two-way (punching) shear. With 75 mm cover and 20M bars, $d = 450 - 75 - 20 = 355$ mm. The critical perimeter at $d/2$ around the 628 × 328 base plate is $b_o = 3332$ mm, and with $\beta_c = 628/328 = 1.91$ the governing stress from Cl 13.3.4 is $0.19\phi_c\lambda\sqrt{f'_c}$ scaled to $0.965$ MPa, so $$V_r = 0.965(3332)(355)/10^3 = 1141\ \text{kN} \;\gt\; V_f = 498\ \text{kN}\quad\checkmark$$
  10. One-way shear and flexure. The cantilever from the plate face is $(1200 - 628)/2 = 286$ mm, less than $d = 355$ mm, so the one-way critical section falls outside the footing and that check does not arise. The cantilever moment is $$M_f = \frac{q_f B x^2}{2} = \frac{647(1.2)(0.286)^2}{2} = 31.8\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m},$$ which needs only 212 mm$^2$ of steel. Minimum reinforcement $A_{s,min} = 0.002 A_g = 0.002(1200)(450) = 1080$ mm$^2$ therefore governs; provide $\boxed{\text{4 – 20M each way}}$ ($1200$ mm$^2$) at the bottom with 75 mm cover.
  11. Sliding. The 41.9 kN service shear is resisted by base friction alone: with $\tan\delta = 0.5$ the available resistance is $0.5(621.4 + 15.6) = 319$ kN, a factor of 7.6, so no shear key is needed.
W610x217 base plate 4-20M each way 1200 mm square 450 Section 1200 Plan Pinned base: axial load only, no base moment
Preliminary footing at A: 1200 mm square, 450 mm thick, 4-20M each way. The pinned base transmits axial load and shear only.
QuantityValue
Cl 13.8.2(a) cross-section0.449
Cl 13.8.2(b) overall member0.456
Cl 13.8.2(c) segment A–B / B–C0.282 / 0.463
Verdict on member ABCadequate; governing ratio 0.46
Service load on the footing621.4 kN axial, 41.9 kN shear
Footing size1200 × 1200 × 450 mm
Bearing pressure442 kPa < 500 kPa allowable
Punching shear$V_f = 498$ kN vs $V_r = 1141$ kN
Reinforcement4 – 20M each way (minimum steel governs)