16-Civ-B2 Advanced Structural Design · December 2017
Question 5 of 7: Prestressed concrete girder with no tension in the cross-section
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams,
December 2017, 16-Civ-B2 Advanced Structural Design — 3 hours, open book
(design handbooks and textbooks permitted). Seven design questions of equal
value; any five constitute a complete paper. All seven are solved here
because the set is a study resource. Page 1 supplies the design data used
throughout: concrete $f'_c = 30$ MPa; structural steel $F_y = 350$ MPa; rebar
$f_y = 400$ MPa; prestressed concrete $f_{ci} = 35$ MPa at transfer,
$f'_c = 50$ MPa, $n = 6$, $f_{ult} = 1750$ MPa, $f_{py} = 1450$ MPa,
$f_{initial} = 1200$ MPa, losses $= 240$ MPa. Page 1 also states that
all loads shown are unfactored.
Reference texts. CSA S16:19 Design of Steel
Structures (Cl 8.5, 13.4, 13.6, 13.8, 14.3–14.6, 17); CISC
Handbook of Steel Construction, 11th ed.; CSA A23.3:19 Design of
Concrete Structures (Cl 9.8, 10, 11, 15, 18); CSA S6:19 Canadian
Highway Bridge Design Code; Kulak & Grondin, Limit States Design
in Structural Steel, 10th ed.; MacGregor & Bartlett, Reinforced
Concrete: Mechanics and Design (Canadian ed.); Collins & Mitchell,
Prestressed Concrete Structures.
Check: load factors. The paper states only that the loads
are unfactored and gives no dead/live split. Throughout, the printed loads are
taken as one variable-load case and factored by $1.5$, while self weight that
the solver introduces (concrete frames, the prestressed girder, the bridge
deck) is factored by $1.25$, per NBCC 2020 Table 4.1.3.2. The mechanisms,
section classifications and interaction equations are unaffected by that
choice; only the magnitudes scale.
Question 5: Prestressed concrete girder with no tension in the cross-section (12 + 6 + 2 marks)
Given. From Figure 4: a girder pinned at A, on a
roller at B 18 m away, and cantilevering a further 2 m to a free end at C.
Point loads of 500 kN act at 6 m and 12 m from A, and 80 kN acts at the tip C.
Page 1 gives the prestressed-concrete data.
Quantity
Symbol
Value
Span A–B / overhang B–C
—
18 m / 2 m
Point loads at 6 m and 12 m
$P$
500 kN each
Load at the tip C
$P_C$
80 kN
Concrete strength at transfer
$f_{ci}$
35 MPa
Concrete strength in service
$f'_c$
50 MPa
Initial tendon stress
$f_{pi}$
1200 MPa
Losses
$\Delta f$
240 MPa, so $f_{se} = 960$ MPa
Tendon ultimate / yield
$f_{ult}$ / $f_{py}$
1750 / 1450 MPa
Find. A concrete section, a prestressing force and
a cable profile such that no fibre anywhere on the member goes into tension,
either at transfer or in service, and the ultimate flexural resistance is
adequate.
Figure 4: 18 m span with a 2 m overhang. The parabolic tendon is anchored on the centroid at A and at B and reaches e = 500 mm at mid-span; it runs along the centroid over the cantilever.
Approach. Work out the service and self-weight
moment diagrams, use the "no tension" conditions to write the two limits on the
tendon eccentricity at each section, size the section so that a permissible
window exists, choose the strand count that opens it comfortably, then draw a
parabola inside the window and confirm every fibre stress and the ultimate
moment.
Reactions and the applied moment diagram. Taking moments
about A for the point loads,
$$R_B = \frac{500(6) + 500(12) + 80(20)}{18} = 588.9\ \text{kN},\qquad
R_A = 1080 - 588.9 = 491.1\ \text{kN}.$$
The applied sagging moment peaks between the two 500 kN loads, and the tip load
puts $-160$ kN·m of hogging at B.
Choose a trial section and add self weight. A T-section
with a $1200 \times 250$ flange on a 400 mm web, 1800 mm deep, gives
$A = 920\,000$ mm$^2$, $\bar y_t = 731.5$ mm, $I = 2.895\times10^{11}$
mm$^4$, hence
$$\begin{gathered}Z_t = 3.957\times10^{8}, \\ Z_b = 2.709\times10^{8}\ \text{mm}^3, \\ k_t = \frac{Z_b}{A} = 294.5, \\ k_b = \frac{Z_t}{A} = 430.1\ \text{mm}.\end{gathered}$$
Its self weight is 22.08 kN/m. Superposing, the total service moment peaks at
$M_T = 3795$ kN·m at $x = 8.49$ m, where the self-weight share is
$M_0 = 870.5$ kN·m; at B the total is $-204.2$ kN·m.
Check the section is big enough. With
$\eta = f_{se}/f_{pi} = 960/1200 = 0.80$ and zero permissible tension, the
bottom fibre requires
$$Z_b \;\ge\; \frac{M_T - \eta M_0}{\eta(0.6f_{ci})}
= \frac{3795 - 0.8(870.5)}{0.8(21)}\times10^{3}
= 1.844\times10^{8}\ \text{mm}^3,$$
comfortably below the $2.709\times10^{8}$ mm$^3$ provided.
The permissible eccentricity window. No tension at the
service bottom fibre and no tension at the transfer top fibre bound $e$ from
both sides:
$$\underbrace{\frac{M_T}{P_e} - k_t}_{e_{min}} \;\le\; e \;\le\;
\underbrace{k_b + \frac{M_0}{P_i}}_{e_{max}} .$$
A window exists only if
$P_i \ge A(M_T/\eta - M_0)/(Z_t + Z_b)$, which for this section is 4282 kN
— the two limits then touch, so a workable design needs more.
Choose the tendon. Take 38 – 15.2 mm strands,
$A_{ps} = 5320$ mm$^2$:
$$P_i = 5320(1200)/10^3 = 6384\ \text{kN},\qquad
P_e = 5320(960)/10^3 = 5107\ \text{kN}.$$
At $x = 6$ m this opens the window to
$$435.3\ \text{mm} \;\le\; e \;\le\; 552.3\ \text{mm},$$
and at mid-span to $448$–$567$ mm.
Draw the profile inside the window. Anchor the cable on
the centroid at A, where $M = 0$ and the kern rule alone allows
$-294.5 \le e \le 430.1$ mm, and again on the centroid at B, where the
hogging from the cantilever pulls the upper limit down to 423 mm. Between them
use the parabola
$$e(x) = \frac{4e_m x(L - x)}{L^2},\qquad e_m = 500\ \text{mm},$$
which gives $e = 444.4$ mm at both 6 m and 12 m and 500 mm at mid-span. Running
the check at 0.1 m intervals over the whole 20 m gives
$$\boxed{\text{0 violations of the permissible window}}$$
— the cable is admissible everywhere. Over the cantilever it continues
straight along the centroid, which satisfies the kern condition at C where
$M = 0$.
Verify the extreme-fibre stresses. At mid-span, with
$P_i$ acting on the girder self weight alone,
$$f_{top} = \frac{P_i}{A} - \frac{P_i e}{Z_t} + \frac{M_0}{Z_t}
= 6.94 - 8.07 + 2.20 = 1.08\ \text{MPa}\ \ (\ge 0),$$
$$f_{bot} = \frac{P_i}{A} + \frac{P_i e}{Z_b} - \frac{M_0}{Z_b}
= 6.94 + 11.78 - 3.22 = 15.50\ \text{MPa} \;\le\; 0.6f_{ci} = 21\ \text{MPa}.$$
In service, with $P_e$ and the full moment, the same fibres give 8.68 MPa
compression at the top ($\le 0.45f'_c = 22.5$ MPa) and 0.98 MPa
compression at the bottom. At B both fibres stay in compression
(5.04 MPa top, 6.30 MPa bottom) despite the cantilever hogging.
Ultimate flexural resistance. At mid-span
$d_p = \bar y_t + e = 1231.5$ mm. With $\alpha_1 = 0.85 - 0.0015(50) = 0.775$
and $\phi_p = 0.90$,
$$\begin{gathered}T_u = \phi_p A_{ps} f_{ult} = 0.90(5320)(1750)/10^3 = 8379\ \text{kN}, \\ a = \frac{T_u}{\alpha_1\phi_c f'_c b} = 277.2\ \text{mm},\end{gathered}$$
$$M_r = T_u\!\left(d_p - \frac{a}{2}\right) = 9158\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}
\;\gt\; M_f = 1.5(2920) + 1.25(872) = 5470\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}
\quad\checkmark$$
As is usual for a no-tension design, serviceability governs and the ultimate
check passes with a factor of 1.67 in hand.
Mid-span section: 1200 x 250 flange on a 400 mm web, 1800 mm deep, with 38 - 15.2 mm strands at e = 500 mm below the centroid.