16-Civ-B2 Advanced Structural Design · December 2017
Question 4 of 7: Composite steel–concrete bridge cross-section and shear connectors
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. National Exams,
December 2017, 16-Civ-B2 Advanced Structural Design — 3 hours, open book
(design handbooks and textbooks permitted). Seven design questions of equal
value; any five constitute a complete paper. All seven are solved here
because the set is a study resource. Page 1 supplies the design data used
throughout: concrete $f'_c = 30$ MPa; structural steel $F_y = 350$ MPa; rebar
$f_y = 400$ MPa; prestressed concrete $f_{ci} = 35$ MPa at transfer,
$f'_c = 50$ MPa, $n = 6$, $f_{ult} = 1750$ MPa, $f_{py} = 1450$ MPa,
$f_{initial} = 1200$ MPa, losses $= 240$ MPa. Page 1 also states that
all loads shown are unfactored.
Reference texts. CSA S16:19 Design of Steel
Structures (Cl 8.5, 13.4, 13.6, 13.8, 14.3–14.6, 17); CISC
Handbook of Steel Construction, 11th ed.; CSA A23.3:19 Design of
Concrete Structures (Cl 9.8, 10, 11, 15, 18); CSA S6:19 Canadian
Highway Bridge Design Code; Kulak & Grondin, Limit States Design
in Structural Steel, 10th ed.; MacGregor & Bartlett, Reinforced
Concrete: Mechanics and Design (Canadian ed.); Collins & Mitchell,
Prestressed Concrete Structures.
Check: load factors. The paper states only that the loads
are unfactored and gives no dead/live split. Throughout, the printed loads are
taken as one variable-load case and factored by $1.5$, while self weight that
the solver introduces (concrete frames, the prestressed girder, the bridge
deck) is factored by $1.25$, per NBCC 2020 Table 4.1.3.2. The mechanisms,
section classifications and interaction equations are unaffected by that
choice; only the magnitudes scale.
Given. From Figure 3: a 12 m wide deck with a
275 mm reinforced concrete slab on two built-up steel box girders at
$4.5 + 4.5 = 9$ m centres with 1.5 m overhangs each side. The notes on the
figure give a design span of 18 m and a design live load of 16 kPa. Materials
are $f'_c = 30$ MPa and $F_y = 350$ MPa.
Quantity
Symbol
Value
Simply supported span
$L$
18 m
Deck width / girder spacing / overhang
—
12 m / 9 m / 1.5 m
Slab thickness
$t_s$
275 mm
Design live load
$w_L$
16 kPa
Tributary width per girder
$b_t$
6.0 m
Concrete / steel strength
$f'_c$ / $F_y$
30 / 350 MPa
Stud diameter (chosen)
$d_{sc}$
19 mm, $F_u = 450$ MPa
Find. (a) plate sizes for one built-up box girder
such that the composite section resists the factored sagging moment; (b) the
number and spacing of 19 mm headed studs in each shear span.
[Figure not reproduced: Figure 3 as printed: 12 m deck, 275 mm slab, two built-up steel box girders at 9 m centres with 1.5 m overhangs. Design span 18 m, design live load 16 kPa. See the official exam paper.]
Approach. Take one girder with its 6 m tributary
width, build the factored load, fix the effective slab width from Cl 17.4, size
the box on the plastic composite resistance with the neutral axis in the slab,
check web shear, then convert the flange force into a stud count with the
Cl 17.7 resistance.
Part (a) — loads on one girder. The slab weighs
$0.275(24) = 6.6$ kPa, so over 6 m of deck it delivers 39.6 kN/m. Allowing
1.5 kN/m for the railing and, after the section below is settled, 3.13 kN/m for
the girder itself (its area is $37\,000$ mm$^2$, plus 10 per cent for
diaphragms),
$$w_D = 39.6 + 3.13 + 1.5 = 44.2\ \text{kN/m},\qquad
w_L = 16(6.0) = 96.0\ \text{kN/m}.$$
Factored moment and shear. With $1.25D + 1.5L$,
$$w_f = 1.25(44.2) + 1.5(96.0) = 199.3\ \text{kN/m},$$
$$M_f = \frac{w_f L^2}{8} = \frac{199.3(18)^2}{8} = 8071\ \text{kN}\cdot
\text{m},\qquad V_f = \frac{w_f L}{2} = 1794\ \text{kN}.$$
The live load dominates: it contributes 72 per cent of $w_f$.
Effective slab width. Cl 17.4.1 limits the width acting
with each girder to $L/4$, and separately to the girder spacing. Here
$L/4 = 4500$ mm governs against the 9000 mm spacing, so
$$b_e = 4500\ \text{mm}.$$
Note the deck is 12 m wide but only $2 \times 4.5 = 9$ m of it is mobilised as
compression flange — the rest is load, not resistance.
Trial box girder. Take a bottom flange $600 \times 20$,
two webs $900 \times 10$ and two top flanges $250 \times 14$:
$$A_s = 600(20) + 2(900)(10) + 2(250)(14) = 37\,000\ \text{mm}^2,$$
overall steel depth $934$ mm, and taking moments of area about the soffit the
steel centroid sits $\bar y = 407.3$ mm up. The mass is 290 kg/m, confirming the
3.13 kN/m assumed in step 1.
Locate the plastic neutral axis. The steel can deliver
$$T = \phi A_s F_y = 0.90(37\,000)(350)/10^3 = 11\,655\ \text{kN},$$
while the slab can supply
$C_{max} = 0.85\phi_c f'_c b_e t_s = 0.85(0.65)(30)(4500)(275)/10^3
= 20\,512$ kN. Since $T \lt C_{max}$ the whole steel section yields in tension
and the neutral axis lies inside the slab, with
$$a = \frac{T}{0.85\phi_c f'_c b_e} = \frac{11\,655\times10^3}{74\,588}
= 156.3\ \text{mm} \;\lt\; 275\ \text{mm}\quad\checkmark$$
Moment resistance. The lever arm runs from the centroid of
the compression block to the steel centroid:
$$d_1 = \left(934 + 275 - \frac{156.3}{2}\right) - 407.3 = 723.6\ \text{mm},$$
$$M_r = T d_1 = 11\,655(0.7236) = \boxed{8434\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}}
\;\gt\; M_f = 8071\ \text{kN}\cdot\text{m}\quad\checkmark$$
a utilisation of 0.96 — a tight, economical section.
Web shear. The two webs give
$A_w = 2(900)(10) = 18\,000$ mm$^2$ with $h/w = 90$. Unstiffened
($k_v = 5.34$), $F_{cri} = 180\,000(5.34)/90^2 = 118.7$ MPa, so
$$V_r = 0.90(18\,000)(118.7)/10^3 = 1922\ \text{kN} \;\gt\; 1794\ \text{kN}
\quad\checkmark$$
at 0.93 — adequate without intermediate stiffeners, though bearing
stiffeners and internal diaphragms are still required at the supports.
Part (b) — horizontal shear to be transferred. For
full interaction Cl 17.9.4 requires the connectors between the point of maximum
moment and the support to carry the smaller of the two flange capacities:
$$V_h = \min(11\,655,\ 20\,512) = 11\,655\ \text{kN}$$
per half span, i.e. the whole steel yield force.
Resistance of one stud. For a 19 mm headed stud,
$A_{sc} = 283.5$ mm$^2$ and $E_c = 4500\sqrt{30} = 24\,648$ MPa, so
Cl 17.7.2 gives
$$q_r = 0.5\phi_{sc}A_{sc}\sqrt{f'_c E_c}
= 0.5(0.80)(283.5)\sqrt{30(24\,648)}/10^3 = 97.5\ \text{kN},$$
below the ceiling $\phi_{sc}A_{sc}F_u = 102$ kN, so $q_r = 97.5$ kN.
Number and spacing.
$$n = \frac{V_h}{q_r} = \frac{11\,655}{97.5} = \boxed{120\ \text{studs per half
span}}\ (240\ \text{per girder}).$$
With four studs per row — two on each of the two top flanges — that
is 30 rows over 9 m, i.e. a uniform pitch of 300 mm. Check the detailing
limits: the pitch is under the $8t_s = 2200$ mm and 600 mm maxima, the
transverse spacing of 125 mm exceeds $4d = 76$ mm, and 100 mm studs give
$h/d = 5.3 \ge 4$.
Plastic composite section: the neutral axis lies 156 mm into the slab, so the entire steel box yields in tension and the couple acts over a 724 mm lever arm.