NivaarExam PrepOfficial exam papers ↗

22-Elec-B7 Power Systems Engineering · December 2014

Question 5 of 7: Consequences of Short Circuits, and a Mid-Line Three-Phase Fault

Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)

Notes on this paper

Paper format. National Exams, December 2014 — 07-Elec-B7 Power Systems Engineering. Open book, three hours, any non-communicating calculator permitted. Seven problems; the paper states that any five constitute a complete paper and that only the first five appearing in the answer book are marked, and that all questions are of equal value. All seven are solved here, because the set is a study resource rather than a sitting.

Reference texts.

Question 5 (Problem 5): Consequences of Short Circuits, and a Mid-Line Three-Phase Fault (5 + 10 + 10 points)

Question text not reproduced: the examination questions are © Engineers and Geoscientists BC. Open the official past paper (linked at the top of this page) to read the question, then follow the worked solution below.

Part (a) — consequences of short-circuit faults. A short circuit collapses the impedance between the sources and the fault point, so the immediate consequence is a current of five to twenty times rated flowing from every machine that can reach the fault. That current does mechanical and thermal damage first: the electromagnetic forces between adjacent conductors and between the turns of a transformer winding scale with the square of the current and can distort or tear windings and busbars in the first few cycles, while the $I^{2}t$ energy melts contacts, vaporises conductors at the arc root and ignites insulation. An arcing fault releases enough energy to constitute an arc-flash hazard to anyone working nearby, which is why Canadian practice under CSA Z462 requires the incident energy to be calculated from exactly this fault current.

The system-wide consequences matter as much. The bus voltages collapse over a wide area — as this problem shows, the healthy buses of a meshed network fall to a third or a half of nominal — so motors stall or drop out, sensitive process loads trip, and the reactive demand of recovering motor load makes the depression worse. Generators lose their ability to export electrical power while the turbines keep delivering mechanical power, so the machines accelerate; if the fault is not cleared before the critical clearing time they pull out of step, which is the subject of Problem 7. Unbalanced faults inject negative-sequence current that heats generator rotors, and zero-sequence current that flows in the earth and couples into communication circuits. Finally, every fault stresses the protection: a mis-graded or slow scheme turns a local fault into a cascading outage.

Given. A three-bus network in which generator 1 (0.2 p.u.) reaches bus 1 through a 0.125 p.u. transformer and generator 2 (0.15 p.u.) reaches bus 2 through a 0.035 p.u. transformer; line 1–2 is 0.225 p.u. and lines 1–3 and 2–3 are 0.24 p.u. each. Both source voltages are 1.0 p.u.

Given data
QuantitySymbolValue
Generator 1 / transformer 1 reactancexG1, xT10.2 and 0.125 p.u.
Generator 2 / transformer 2 reactancexG2, xT20.15 and 0.035 p.u.
Line 1–2x120.225 p.u.
Line 1–3x130.24 p.u.
Line 2–3x230.24 p.u.
Prefault voltage at both sourcesE1.0 p.u.
Fault—bolted three-phase, mid-point of line 1–3

Find. The bolted three-phase fault current at the mid-point of line 1–3, and the voltages at buses 1 and 2 during that fault.

G1 G2 0.200 0.125 0.15 0.035 0.225 0.24 0.24 1 2 3 F all reactances in per unit on a common base; fault F at the mid-point of line 1–3
Figure 5 — single-line diagram for the three-phase fault study, with the fault point F at the mid-point of line 1–3.
step 1 — collapse the radial branches 1 2 0.3250 0.1850 reference node N 0.225 0.120 0.360 F F the two red terminals are the same node F, reached along either route step 2 — Δ–Y transform of the (1, 2, N) triangle F arm A = 0.2195 arm B = 0.4166 Z(N) = 0.0818 X(th) = (arm A || arm B) + Z(N) = j0.2256 pu
Figure 6 — reducing the faulted network to a single Thevenin reactance seen from F: collapse the radials, then transform the (1, 2, N) triangle.

Approach. Reduce the network to a single Thevenin reactance seen from the fault point using one delta-to-star transform, then back-substitute the current division to recover the bus voltages.

  1. Part (b) — collapse the two radial branches. Each machine and its transformer form a single series path from the common source node N to its bus: $$\begin{gathered}x_{N1}=0.2+0.125=0.3250, \\ x_{N2}=0.15+0.035=0.1850\end{gathered}$$ Splitting line 1–3 at its mid-point creates the fault node F, so the fault sees 0.120 p.u. towards bus 1 and, through the remaining half plus line 2–3, $$x_{F\text{-}3\text{-}2}=0.120+0.24=0.360$$ towards bus 2. Bus 3 is a passive junction and disappears into that sum.
  2. Transform the (1, 2, N) triangle to a star. The three nodes 1, 2 and N are joined in a delta by line 1–2 and the two radial branches, and the fault current has to pass through it. With $\Sigma=x_{12}+x_{N1}+x_{N2}=0.7350$, $$\begin{gathered}Z_{1}=\dfrac{x_{12}x_{N1}}{\Sigma}=0.0994898, \\ Z_{2}=\dfrac{x_{12}x_{N2}}{\Sigma}=0.0566327, \\ Z_{N}=\dfrac{x_{N1}x_{N2}}{\Sigma}=0.0818027\end{gathered}$$
  3. Combine the two arms and add the common branch. The fault now sees two parallel routes to the star point, and the star point reaches the source node through $Z_{N}$: $$\begin{gathered}\text{arm A}=0.120+Z_{1}=0.2194898, \\ \text{arm B}=0.360+Z_{2}=0.4166327\end{gathered}$$ $$\begin{aligned}&X_{th} \\ &=\dfrac{(\text{arm A})(\text{arm B})}{\text{arm A}+\text{arm B}}+Z_{N} \\ &=0.1437563+0.0818027=\boxed{j0.225559\ \text{p.u.}}\end{aligned}$$
  4. Fault current. With a bolted fault the terminal voltage at F is zero and the prefault voltage is 1.0 p.u., so $$\boxed{I_{F}=\dfrac{1.0}{jX_{th}}=\dfrac{1.0}{j0.225559}=-j4.433429\ \text{p.u.} \;\;(\,|I_{F}|=4.433429\ \text{p.u.})}$$ An independent bus-impedance-matrix inversion of the same five-branch network returns $Z_{FF}=j0.225559$ to six figures, which confirms the hand reduction.
  5. Part (c) — back-substitute for the star-point voltage. The fault current flows out of the source node through $Z_{N}$ first, so $$\begin{aligned}V_{N'}&=1.0-I_{F}Z_{N} \\ &=1.0-(4.433429)(0.0818027) \\ &=0.637333\ \text{p.u.}\end{aligned}$$ It then divides between the two arms in inverse proportion to their reactances: $$\begin{gathered}I_{A}=\dfrac{V_{N'}}{\text{arm A}}=2.903704, \\ I_{B}=\dfrac{V_{N'}}{\text{arm B}}=1.529725\end{gathered}$$ and the two add back to 4.433429 p.u., which is the fault current again — a free check on the division.
  6. Bus voltages under the fault. Each bus sits one star arm away from the star point, carrying its own share of the current: $$\begin{aligned}V_{1}&=V_{N'}-I_{A}Z_{1} \\ &=0.637333-(2.903704)(0.0994898) \\ &=\boxed{0.348444\ \text{p.u.}}\end{aligned}$$ $$\begin{aligned}V_{2}&=V_{N'}-I_{B}Z_{2} \\ &=0.637333-(1.529725)(0.0566327) \\ &=\boxed{0.550701\ \text{p.u.}}\end{aligned}$$ Both are real because every element is a pure reactance and both sources were taken at the same angle. The arithmetic closes on itself: continuing from bus 1 through the 0.120 p.u. half-line gives $0.348444-(2.903704)(0.120)=0$, which is the fault point, and the same is true along the other route. For completeness the same substitution gives $V_{3}=0.183567$ p.u.
Problem 5 — results
QuantitySymbolResult
Thevenin reactance at the faultXthj0.225559 p.u.
(b) fault current|IF|4.4334 p.u. (lagging 90°)
(c) voltage at bus 1V10.3484 p.u.
(c) voltage at bus 2V20.5507 p.u.
Voltage at bus 3 (by-product)V30.1836 p.u.