22-Mec-B2 Environmental Control in Buildings · May 2018
Question 3 of 8: Terminal reheat and VAV with discriminator control (20 marks)
Nivaar worked solution (AI-drafted; not reviewed by a licensed engineer)
Notes on this paper
Paper format. Eight problems, three hours, open book.
Problem 1 carries 30 marks, Problem 2 carries 10 marks and Problems 3 to 8
carry 20 marks each; candidates answer any five, and indicate their choice on
the cover of the first workbook. Psychrometric charts (SI and inch-pound) and
an R-134a pressure–enthalpy diagram are appended to the paper.
All eight problems are solved below, because the set as a whole
is the study resource.
Reference texts.
ASHRAE, Handbook — Fundamentals (2021): Ch.1 psychrometrics,
Ch.16 ventilation and infiltration, Ch.18 heating and cooling load
calculations, Ch.21 duct design, Ch.26 heat, air and moisture transmission.
McQuiston, Parker and Spitler, Heating, Ventilating and Air
Conditioning: Analysis and Design, 6th ed. — loads, psychrometric
processes, duct and air distribution design.
W. P. Jones, Air Conditioning Engineering, 5th ed. — the
percentage-saturation convention, apparatus dew point and coil by-pass factor,
face-and-by-pass plant.
Shan K. Wang, Handbook of Air Conditioning and Refrigeration, 2nd
ed. — single-duct reheat and VAV systems, discriminator (zone-demand)
control.
ASHRAE Standard 55-2023, Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human
Occupancy; ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2022, Ventilation for Acceptable
Indoor Air Quality.
National Building Code of Canada 2020 and NRCan / Environment and Climate
Change Canada climatic design data for the Canadian design conditions used in
Problems 5 and 7.
Check: two readings taken from the printed
paper.
(1) The length label on the Problem 6 duct sketch is printed as
“L1 = =100 ft == 6ft”. The equation editor
has dropped the symbols after each equals sign; the pattern
“something = something = 100 ft” and
“something = something = 6 ft” means four named
lengths in two equal pairs, and the sketch shows exactly four duct runs. The
solution therefore takes L1 = L2 = 100 ft
(plenum to tee, and tee to elbow) and L3 = L4 =
6 ft (the two drops to the ceiling diffusers), and states the reading
as an assumption under cover-page instruction 1. Only the pressure totals in
parts (c) and (d) depend on it; the duct diameters in part (a) do not.
(2) Problem 1 gives the outdoor air as “percentage saturation
50 %” but the room as “RH 50 %”. These are different
quantities and the difference is deliberate: percentage saturation is
$\mu = W/W_{s}$, relative humidity is $\phi = p_{w}/p_{ws}$. At 26 °C
the 50 % saturation state is 50.8 % RH, so treating them as
interchangeable shifts the outdoor humidity ratio by about
0.2 g/kg.
Question 3: Terminal reheat and VAV with discriminator control
(20 marks)
Given. Two zones served from one air-handling unit,
both held at the same dry-bulb temperature, with the loads at the design hour
well below the design capacity.
Given data, Problem 3
Quantity
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone dry-bulb setpoint
75 °F
75 °F
Design supply air flow
3,200 cfm
2,000 cfm
Sensible cooling load at the hour
60,000 Btu/h
30,000 Btu/h
Design cold-deck temperature
55 °F dry bulb
Air density (dry air assumed)
0.075 lbm/ft³
VAV minimum flow setting, part (b)
20 % of design
Find. The reheat energy required in each zone at that hour,
(a) for a constant-volume system with terminal reheat and (b) for a VAV system
with a 20 % minimum, both under discriminator control.
Approach. Discriminator (zone-demand) control resets the
cold-deck temperature until the zone with the greatest demand is just satisfied
with no reheat at all; every other zone then reheats the difference. So find
each zone's required supply temperature, take the lowest as the reset value,
and price the reheat from there.
Problem 3 (a): the constant-volume plant with terminal reheat. Discriminator control resets the cold deck until the hungriest zone (Zone 1) needs no reheat at all.
Fix the sensible-heat coefficient from the stated density.
For dry air at the stated density,
$$\dot{Q}_{s} = \dot{V}\,\rho\,c_{p}\,\Delta t
= \dot{V}\,(60)(0.075)(0.24)\,\Delta t = 1.08\,\dot{V}\,\Delta t$$
with $\dot V$ in cfm and $\Delta t$ in °F. The familiar 1.08 is therefore
not a memorised constant here but a direct consequence of the density the
question supplies.
Part (a) — what supply temperature does each zone want?
At constant volume the flow is fixed at its design value, so each zone needs the
temperature difference that carries its own load:
$$\Delta t_{1} = \frac{60{,}000}{1.08 \times 3{,}200} = 17.36\ ^\circ\text{F}
\quad\Longrightarrow\quad t_{s,1} = 75 - 17.36 = 57.64\ ^\circ\text{F}$$
$$\Delta t_{2} = \frac{30{,}000}{1.08 \times 2{,}000} = 13.89\ ^\circ\text{F}
\quad\Longrightarrow\quad t_{s,2} = 75 - 13.89 = 61.11\ ^\circ\text{F}$$
Zone 1 is the hungrier of the two — not because its load is larger in
absolute terms, but because its load per unit of air is larger.
Apply the discriminator. One cold deck serves both zones,
so it must be cold enough for the most demanding of them. The controller resets
it upward from the 55 °F design value to the lowest of the
required temperatures:
$$t_{\text{deck}} = \min\,(57.64,\ 61.11) = \boxed{57.64\ ^\circ\text{F}}$$
Zone 1 is then the control zone and takes no reheat at all.
Part (a) — price the reheat. Zone 2 receives air at
57.64 °F when it wanted 61.11 °F, and its terminal box makes
up the difference at the fixed design flow:
$$\dot{Q}_{rh,2} = 1.08 \times 2{,}000 \times (61.11 - 57.64)
= \boxed{7{,}500\ \text{Btu/h}}, \qquad
\dot{Q}_{rh,1} = \boxed{0}$$
The same calculation is worth doing without the reset, to see what the
discriminator buys: at a fixed 55 °F deck the two boxes would burn
$1.08(3{,}200)(2.64) = 9{,}120$ and $1.08(2{,}000)(6.11) = 13{,}200$ Btu/h,
a total of 22,320 Btu/h. Resetting the deck cuts the reheat by
14,820 Btu/h, or 66 %, and cuts the coil load by the same amount
again.
Part (b) — VAV, first at the design deck temperature.
A VAV box throttles the flow instead of reheating it, so at 55 °F each
zone would draw
$$\dot{V}_{1} = \frac{60{,}000}{1.08(75-55)} = 2{,}778\ \text{cfm},\qquad
\dot{V}_{2} = \frac{30{,}000}{1.08(75-55)} = 1{,}389\ \text{cfm}$$
against minimum positions of $0.20(3{,}200) = 640$ and
$0.20(2{,}000) = 400$ cfm. Both required flows are far above their minima,
so neither box is forced open beyond what its zone needs.
Part (b) — apply the discriminator to the VAV plant.
Here the discriminator resets the deck upward until the neediest box reaches
full flow. Zone 1 reaches its 3,200 cfm design flow at exactly the
57.64 °F found in step 3, so the reset is the same, and Zone 2 then
throttles to
$$\dot{V}_{2} = \frac{30{,}000}{1.08\,(75 - 57.64)} = 1{,}600\ \text{cfm}$$
which is four times its 400 cfm minimum.
Part (b) — the answer, and where it would change.
Since neither box is on its minimum stop, neither has more air than its load can
absorb, and
$$\boxed{\dot{Q}_{rh,1} = \dot{Q}_{rh,2} = 0\ \text{Btu/h}}$$
Reheat in a VAV system appears only once a box bottoms out on its minimum
position. At the 55 °F design deck that happens below
$1.08(640)(20) = 13{,}824$ Btu/h in Zone 1 and
$1.08(400)(20) = 8{,}640$ Btu/h in Zone 2 — roughly 23 % and
29 % of the loads at this hour, so both zones have a wide margin before any
energy is thrown away.
Interpret the comparison. The same two zones at the same
hour need 7,500 Btu/h of reheat as a constant-volume plant and none at all
as a VAV plant, and the VAV fan is moving 4,800 cfm rather than
5,200 cfm. That is the entire case for VAV in one line: constant-volume
reheat pays twice for part load, once at the coil and once at the reheater,
while VAV simply stops delivering air it does not need.